Building research partnerships with local government:Reviewing five years of a Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (PHIRST)

<b>Background</b>:<br/>Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Teams (PHIRST) are academic teams funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) to provide rapid evaluations of public health interventions at no cost to local government. PHIRST Insight, a collaboration between the Universities of Bristol and Cardiff, was established in 2020 and completed 10 studies of a diverse range of local public health interventions over five years. This study examined local government partners’ and academic researchers’ experience of co-producing studies, and the perceived impact of PHIRST Insight studies.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b>:<br/>This is a qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff involved in each of the 10 Insight studies. Participants included local government staff (including some from third-sector organisations commissioned to deliver interventions) (N=13) and members of the PHIRST academic team (N=12). Interview transcripts were analysed using the Framework method of thematic analysis.<br/><br/><b>Results</b>:<br/>Research undertaken by a PHIRST team was perceived by local government staff to be more robust than that which they could undertake themselves, and the scheme successfully addressed the perceived lack of research skills, staff capacity, and funding within local government to undertake evaluation activity. Both research and local government respondents believed that they developed successful research partnerships through PHIRST, despite identified challenges of working with an external research team. The PHIRST Insight team’s three principles of co-production of studies with local partners, embedding public involvement across all aspects of the studies, and a focus on maximising impact for local government policy and practice were perceived by participants to have been largely met across all ten studies.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b>:<br/>This study finds evidence that local government staff perceive a range of benefits from PHIRST support and that Insight studies have met the aim of the PHIRST scheme, providing timely evidence to inform local government practice or policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14221.1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building research partnerships with local government:Reviewing five years of a Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (PHIRST)

Jemma Hawkins, Hannah Littlecott, Chloe Forte, Georgina Kathryn Wort et al.
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Building research partnerships with local government:Reviewing five years of a Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (PHIRST)

Jemma Hawkins, Hannah Littlecott, Chloe Forte, Georgina Kathryn Wort, P E Jessiman, Hannah F Robinson, Rona M Campbell
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>:<br/>Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Teams (PHIRST) are academic teams funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) to provide rapid evaluations of public health interventions at no cost to local government. PHIRST Insight, a collaboration between the Universities of Bristol and Cardiff, was established in 2020 and completed 10 studies of a diverse range of local public health interventions over five years. This study examined local government partners’ and academic researchers’ experience of co-producing studies, and the perceived impact of PHIRST Insight studies.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b>:<br/>This is a qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff involved in each of the 10 Insight studies. Participants included local government staff (including some from third-sector organisations commissioned to deliver interventions) (N=13) and members of the PHIRST academic team (N=12). Interview transcripts were analysed using the Framework method of thematic analysis.<br/><br/><b>Results</b>:<br/>Research undertaken by a PHIRST team was perceived by local government staff to be more robust than that which they could undertake themselves, and the scheme successfully addressed the perceived lack of research skills, staff capacity, and funding within local government to undertake evaluation activity. Both research and local government respondents believed that they developed successful research partnerships through PHIRST, despite identified challenges of working with an external research team. The PHIRST Insight team’s three principles of co-production of studies with local partners, embedding public involvement across all aspects of the studies, and a focus on maximising impact for local government policy and practice were perceived by participants to have been largely met across all ten studies.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b>:<br/>This study finds evidence that local government staff perceive a range of benefits from PHIRST support and that Insight studies have met the aim of the PHIRST scheme, providing timely evidence to inform local government practice or policy.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.