Attribution of observed pan-Arctic extreme fire events to anthropogenic forcings

Abstract Over the past two decades, the pan-Arctic has experienced rapid climatic change, accompanied by an unprecedented rise in extreme wildfire activity. However, a systematic and regionally comprehensive assessment of the recent extreme fire events in the pan-Arctic and the role played by human emissions is still pending. In this study, we apply a probability-based extreme event attribution framework to evaluate the role of anthropogenic forcings in enabling the extreme pan-Arctic wildfire seasons of 2019, 2020, and 2021. Using large ensemble simulations with the Community Earth System Model version 2, capable of isolating anthropogenic climate forcings, alongside remote sensing burned area products and ERA5 reanalysis, we assess both magnitude (burned area) and extreme fire risk (Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index, FWI). Our results demonstrate that anthropogenic forcings were a necessary condition for the occurrence of these extreme events: the fraction of attributable risk (FAR) exceeded 0.75 for burned area and reached virtual certainty (FAR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.99) for FWI in 2020 and 2021. However, the probability of sufficient causation remained low, highlighting that anthropogenic forcings alone are not enough to guarantee such extreme wildfire events. Risk ratios (RRs) indicate that recent extremes have become over 200 times more likely compared to a climate without anthropogenic influence (RR = 235 [5%–95% CI: 98–489], in 2021). By decomposing FWI, we show that temperature and humidity dominate the recent increase in fire weather risk, supported by a substantial elevation in vapor pressure deficit over the pan-Arctic region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae4d64
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attribution of observed pan-Arctic extreme fire events to anthropogenic forcings

Johanna Baehr, Armineh Barkhordarian, Lukas Fiedler, Victor Brovkin
Environmental Research Letters
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Attribution of observed pan-Arctic extreme fire events to anthropogenic forcings

Johanna Baehr, Armineh Barkhordarian, Lukas Fiedler, Victor Brovkin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Over the past two decades, the pan-Arctic has experienced rapid climatic change, accompanied by an unprecedented rise in extreme wildfire activity. However, a systematic and regionally comprehensive assessment of the recent extreme fire events in the pan-Arctic and the role played by human emissions is still pending. In this study, we apply a probability-based extreme event attribution framework to evaluate the role of anthropogenic forcings in enabling the extreme pan-Arctic wildfire seasons of 2019, 2020, and 2021. Using large ensemble simulations with the Community Earth System Model version 2, capable of isolating anthropogenic climate forcings, alongside remote sensing burned area products and ERA5 reanalysis, we assess both magnitude (burned area) and extreme fire risk (Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index, FWI). Our results demonstrate that anthropogenic forcings were a necessary condition for the occurrence of these extreme events: the fraction of attributable risk (FAR) exceeded 0.75 for burned area and reached virtual certainty (FAR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.99) for FWI in 2020 and 2021. However, the probability of sufficient causation remained low, highlighting that anthropogenic forcings alone are not enough to guarantee such extreme wildfire events. Risk ratios (RRs) indicate that recent extremes have become over 200 times more likely compared to a climate without anthropogenic influence (RR = 235 [5%–95% CI: 98–489], in 2021). By decomposing FWI, we show that temperature and humidity dominate the recent increase in fire weather risk, supported by a substantial elevation in vapor pressure deficit over the pan-Arctic region.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 21(6)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.