Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Clinical Predictors of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Study

<b>Background:</b> Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly administered in rectal cancer, but compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), data regarding the gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity profile and clinical predictors remain limited. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate GI toxicity associated with TNT compared with CRT and to explore clinical predictors of these adverse events (AEs). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 201 patients with rectal cancer treated with TNT (<i>n</i> = 157) and CRT (<i>n</i> = 44). GI AEs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. In the analysis of factors associated with GI AEs, multiple clinical and pathological variables were included using multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> The composite endpoint "any GI AEs grade ≥ 1" was more frequent in the TNT group compared with the CRT group (33.1% vs. 15.9%; RR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.02-4.25; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Nausea was significantly more frequent in the TNT group (28.7% vs. 9.1%; RR = 3.15; 95% CI 1.20-8.30; <i>p</i> = 0.012), whereas vomiting (9.6% vs. 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.203) and diarrhea (17.8% vs. 9.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.242) did not reach statistical significance. In multivariable logistic regression, TNT (OR = 2.65; 95% CI 1.08-6.53; <i>p</i> = 0.032) and female sex (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.05-3.77; <i>p</i> = 0.033) were identified as independent predictors of grade ≥ 1 GI AEs. For nausea, TNT remained significant (OR = 4.37; 95% CI 1.45-13.20; <i>p</i> = 0.0089). Upper rectal tumor location was significantly associated with vomiting (<i>p</i> = 0.0054). No grade 3-4 GI AEs were observed in either treatment group. <b>Conclusions:</b> TNT was associated with a higher incidence of mild GI AEs, predominantly driven by nausea, without an increase in severe toxicities. TNT and female sex were identified as independent clinical predictors of an increased risk of GI AEs, while tumor location in the upper third of the rectum was associated with a higher occurrence of vomiting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030422
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Clinical Predictors of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Stelian Ştefăniţă Mogoantă, Ramona Adriana Schenker, Lucian Dragoș Bratu, Puiu Olivian Stovicek et al.
1 citations
Life
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
24.20
article

Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Clinical Predictors of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Stelian Ştefăniţă Mogoantă, Ramona Adriana Schenker, Lucian Dragoș Bratu, Puiu Olivian Stovicek, Andrei M. Dicianu, Alina Maria Mehedințeanu, Ana-Maria Ciurea, Tradian Ciprian Berisha, Carmen Stamulescu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly administered in rectal cancer, but compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), data regarding the gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity profile and clinical predictors remain limited. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate GI toxicity associated with TNT compared with CRT and to explore clinical predictors of these adverse events (AEs). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 201 patients with rectal cancer treated with TNT (<i>n</i> = 157) and CRT (<i>n</i> = 44). GI AEs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. In the analysis of factors associated with GI AEs, multiple clinical and pathological variables were included using multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> The composite endpoint "any GI AEs grade ≥ 1" was more frequent in the TNT group compared with the CRT group (33.1% vs. 15.9%; RR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.02-4.25; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Nausea was significantly more frequent in the TNT group (28.7% vs. 9.1%; RR = 3.15; 95% CI 1.20-8.30; <i>p</i> = 0.012), whereas vomiting (9.6% vs. 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.203) and diarrhea (17.8% vs. 9.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.242) did not reach statistical significance. In multivariable logistic regression, TNT (OR = 2.65; 95% CI 1.08-6.53; <i>p</i> = 0.032) and female sex (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.05-3.77; <i>p</i> = 0.033) were identified as independent predictors of grade ≥ 1 GI AEs. For nausea, TNT remained significant (OR = 4.37; 95% CI 1.45-13.20; <i>p</i> = 0.0089). Upper rectal tumor location was significantly associated with vomiting (<i>p</i> = 0.0054). No grade 3-4 GI AEs were observed in either treatment group. <b>Conclusions:</b> TNT was associated with a higher incidence of mild GI AEs, predominantly driven by nausea, without an increase in severe toxicities. TNT and female sex were identified as independent clinical predictors of an increased risk of GI AEs, while tumor location in the upper third of the rectum was associated with a higher occurrence of vomiting.

LifeVol. 16(3)
Titu Maiorescu University (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.