Experimental Investigation into Dynamic and Static Stiffness Relationships in Rubber-Metal Springs

Rubber-metal springs are widely utilized in industrial applications, particularly as vibration absorbers, due to their ability to mitigate dynamic loads. The dynamic stiffness of rubber-metal springs plays a crucial role in determining the natural frequency of a system, as natural frequency is directly linked to dynamic stiffness. Therefore, the accurate determination of dynamic stiffness is essential when selecting an appropriate rubber-metal spring for a given application. However, the assessment of dynamic stiffness presents a significant challenge due to the complex interaction between rubber and metal components, particularly when considering the viscoelastic properties of rubber and the geometric properties of the spring. Rubber’s viscoelastic response and how it changes under different strain rates is fundamentally rooted in the micro- and meso-scale configuration of polymer chains, filler particles, and their bonding to metal components. Consequently, dynamic stiffness is often approximated using static stiffness measurements, which simplifies the problem but may lead to inaccuracies in predicting the true dynamic behaviour of the spring. In this paper, we present an experimental method for dynamic stiffness assessment using an electrodynamic shaker, which allows for a more accurate characterization of the spring’s response to dynamic loading. This method is compared to an analytical approach based on static stiffness, highlighting the limitations of the latter approach. Furthermore, we propose an improved range for calculating dynamic stiffness from static stiffness, enhancing the predictive accuracy for dynamic behaviour.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DepositOnce
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-25480
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Investigation into Dynamic and Static Stiffness Relationships in Rubber-Metal Springs

Nikola Korunović, Dragan Jovanović, Miloš Milošević, Milan S. Banić et al.
DepositOnce
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

Experimental Investigation into Dynamic and Static Stiffness Relationships in Rubber-Metal Springs

Nikola Korunović, Dragan Jovanović, Miloš Milošević, Milan S. Banić, D. Marinković
article en

Abstract

Rubber-metal springs are widely utilized in industrial applications, particularly as vibration absorbers, due to their ability to mitigate dynamic loads. The dynamic stiffness of rubber-metal springs plays a crucial role in determining the natural frequency of a system, as natural frequency is directly linked to dynamic stiffness. Therefore, the accurate determination of dynamic stiffness is essential when selecting an appropriate rubber-metal spring for a given application. However, the assessment of dynamic stiffness presents a significant challenge due to the complex interaction between rubber and metal components, particularly when considering the viscoelastic properties of rubber and the geometric properties of the spring. Rubber’s viscoelastic response and how it changes under different strain rates is fundamentally rooted in the micro- and meso-scale configuration of polymer chains, filler particles, and their bonding to metal components. Consequently, dynamic stiffness is often approximated using static stiffness measurements, which simplifies the problem but may lead to inaccuracies in predicting the true dynamic behaviour of the spring. In this paper, we present an experimental method for dynamic stiffness assessment using an electrodynamic shaker, which allows for a more accurate characterization of the spring’s response to dynamic loading. This method is compared to an analytical approach based on static stiffness, highlighting the limitations of the latter approach. Furthermore, we propose an improved range for calculating dynamic stiffness from static stiffness, enhancing the predictive accuracy for dynamic behaviour.

DepositOnce
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.