Conversation analysis for social justice

Conversation analysis (CA) is often seen as focused on the mundane and minute features of talk-in-interaction without concern for broader issues of social justice. Contrary to these preconceptions, however, CA has been exploring (in)justice, in/exclusion, and (in)equality since its inception. This article offers an overview of CA’s contributions to social justice based on a survey of 168 CA-for-social-justice studies published over the past 50 years. It provides a summary of major CA findings regarding participant orientations to (in)justice and practices for reproducing and resisting injustice in interaction. This is followed by a synthesized review of key methodological features of CA-for-social-justice studies and an illustration of how social justice issues may be explored within the CA framework. The illustration features conversations about gender (in)equality and in/exclusion video-recorded in adult second language classrooms in the U.S., and it showcases CA’s ability to illuminate tacit reproductions of injustice in institutional talk. The article concludes with a reflection on key methodological issues and pathways for future work, including in the form of multimodal, longitudinal, and reflective CA-for-social-justice research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2026.100309
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversation analysis for social justice

Nadja Tadic
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Conversation analysis for social justice

Nadja Tadic
article en

Abstract

Conversation analysis (CA) is often seen as focused on the mundane and minute features of talk-in-interaction without concern for broader issues of social justice. Contrary to these preconceptions, however, CA has been exploring (in)justice, in/exclusion, and (in)equality since its inception. This article offers an overview of CA’s contributions to social justice based on a survey of 168 CA-for-social-justice studies published over the past 50 years. It provides a summary of major CA findings regarding participant orientations to (in)justice and practices for reproducing and resisting injustice in interaction. This is followed by a synthesized review of key methodological features of CA-for-social-justice studies and an illustration of how social justice issues may be explored within the CA framework. The illustration features conversations about gender (in)equality and in/exclusion video-recorded in adult second language classrooms in the U.S., and it showcases CA’s ability to illuminate tacit reproductions of injustice in institutional talk. The article concludes with a reflection on key methodological issues and pathways for future work, including in the form of multimodal, longitudinal, and reflective CA-for-social-justice research.

Research Methods in Applied LinguisticsVol. 5(1)
Georgetown University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.