On the Use of the Meshless Material Point Method for Microelectronic Devices

In this work, the Material Point Method (MPM) is reviewed for application in the microelectronics industry. Microelectronic processes often involve large deformations, evolving interfaces, multiphysics coupling, and complex geometries that challenge conventional mesh-based methods such as the finite element method (FEM). Meshless methods provide an alternative solution that avoids these issues. A comparison is made between Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), Element Free Galerkin (EFG), peridynamics, Radial Basis Function–Finite Difference (RBF-FD), and MPM, evaluated with respect to convergence, consistency and stability, boundary enforcement, adaptivity, coupling, and industrial applicability. Based on this assessment, MPM and its main variants (BSMPM, GIMP, CPDI, and TLMPM) are examined in depth. The method’s ability to address large deformations, moving interfaces, contact, history-dependent material behavior, and multiphysics interactions is examined. The underfill process is used as a representative use case to illustrate challenges such as free surface flow, void formation, thermomechanical coupling, and residual stress. Overall, MPM shows strong potential, although further benchmarking and validation are required for widespread industrial adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14050866
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Use of the Meshless Material Point Method for Microelectronic Devices

G. Zhang, Willem van Driel, Sjoerd D. M. de Jong
Mathematics
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

On the Use of the Meshless Material Point Method for Microelectronic Devices

G. Zhang, Willem van Driel, Sjoerd D. M. de Jong
article en

Abstract

In this work, the Material Point Method (MPM) is reviewed for application in the microelectronics industry. Microelectronic processes often involve large deformations, evolving interfaces, multiphysics coupling, and complex geometries that challenge conventional mesh-based methods such as the finite element method (FEM). Meshless methods provide an alternative solution that avoids these issues. A comparison is made between Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), Element Free Galerkin (EFG), peridynamics, Radial Basis Function–Finite Difference (RBF-FD), and MPM, evaluated with respect to convergence, consistency and stability, boundary enforcement, adaptivity, coupling, and industrial applicability. Based on this assessment, MPM and its main variants (BSMPM, GIMP, CPDI, and TLMPM) are examined in depth. The method’s ability to address large deformations, moving interfaces, contact, history-dependent material behavior, and multiphysics interactions is examined. The underfill process is used as a representative use case to illustrate challenges such as free surface flow, void formation, thermomechanical coupling, and residual stress. Overall, MPM shows strong potential, although further benchmarking and validation are required for widespread industrial adoption.

MathematicsVol. 14(5)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.