Harm reduction for smokers — can new nicotine products play a role?

Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize the health and social consequences of psychoactive substance use. Recently, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heated tobacco products have been promoted as “safer” alternatives to conventional cigarettes. Evidence regarding their safety is inconsistent: while some studies suggest lower levels of certain toxicants, many indicate substantial health risks, including exposure to novel toxic compounds absent in traditional cigarette smoke. Long-term effects remain unknown. The growing use of these products among adolescents, young adults, and never-smokers, combined with messaging framing them as harm reduction tools, raises significant public health concerns. Moreover, these products often perpetuate nicotine dependence rather than support complete cessation, unlike evidence-based interventions such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Economic interests of the tobacco industry further complicate their promotion. Current evidence does not support e-cigarettes or heated tobacco products as legitimate harm reduction tools. Public health priorities should focus on proven cessation strategies, regulatory control, and preventing initiation among youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nowotwory Journal of Oncology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/njo.109184
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harm reduction for smokers — can new nicotine products play a role?

Magdalena Cedzyńska, Irena A. Przepiórka-Rosłońska
Nowotwory Journal of Oncology
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Harm reduction for smokers — can new nicotine products play a role?

Magdalena Cedzyńska, Irena A. Przepiórka-Rosłońska
article en

Abstract

Harm reduction strategies aim to minimize the health and social consequences of psychoactive substance use. Recently, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heated tobacco products have been promoted as “safer” alternatives to conventional cigarettes. Evidence regarding their safety is inconsistent: while some studies suggest lower levels of certain toxicants, many indicate substantial health risks, including exposure to novel toxic compounds absent in traditional cigarette smoke. Long-term effects remain unknown. The growing use of these products among adolescents, young adults, and never-smokers, combined with messaging framing them as harm reduction tools, raises significant public health concerns. Moreover, these products often perpetuate nicotine dependence rather than support complete cessation, unlike evidence-based interventions such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Economic interests of the tobacco industry further complicate their promotion. Current evidence does not support e-cigarettes or heated tobacco products as legitimate harm reduction tools. Public health priorities should focus on proven cessation strategies, regulatory control, and preventing initiation among youth.

Nowotwory Journal of OncologyVol. 76(1)
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.