Evidence-based Interventions for Cancer Screening Access among People with Physical and/or Sensory Disability: a Systematic Review of the Evidence

People with physical and/or sensory disability have lower uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening than those without disability. This systematic review aims to identify evidence-based interventions designed to positively influence cancer screening participation for people with physical and/or sensory disability. Databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies reporting interventions targeting breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer screening for people with physical and/or sensory disability. A qualitative review of the results formed a narrative synthesis. Fifteen studies published between 1995–2022 from the USA, Turkey and Saudi Arabia were included in the review, involving people who were d/Deaf (n = 10), people with physical disability (n = 4), and people with cognitive, hearing, vision or physical disability (n = 1). The interventions included cancer and cancer screening education (n = 13) and environmental interventions that modified healthcare facilities (n = 2). Most educational interventions increased cancer screening knowledge but only some increased screening participation. The environmental interventions showed promising but non-significant effects on screening participation. Despite critical gaps in the literature, this review provides a foundation to develop interventions needed to improve cancer screening participation among people with physical and/or sensory disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02833-0
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-based Interventions for Cancer Screening Access among People with Physical and/or Sensory Disability: a Systematic Review of the Evidence

DA Ouakrim, Carlene J. Wilson, Jennifer McIntosh, Kate Broun et al.
Journal of Cancer Education
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Evidence-based Interventions for Cancer Screening Access among People with Physical and/or Sensory Disability: a Systematic Review of the Evidence

DA Ouakrim, Carlene J. Wilson, Jennifer McIntosh, Kate Broun, Zephaniah Hilton, Sandra Sursock, Kathryn A. Robb, Nancy N. Baxter, Mark Jenkins
article en

Abstract

People with physical and/or sensory disability have lower uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening than those without disability. This systematic review aims to identify evidence-based interventions designed to positively influence cancer screening participation for people with physical and/or sensory disability. Databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies reporting interventions targeting breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer screening for people with physical and/or sensory disability. A qualitative review of the results formed a narrative synthesis. Fifteen studies published between 1995–2022 from the USA, Turkey and Saudi Arabia were included in the review, involving people who were d/Deaf (n = 10), people with physical disability (n = 4), and people with cognitive, hearing, vision or physical disability (n = 1). The interventions included cancer and cancer screening education (n = 13) and environmental interventions that modified healthcare facilities (n = 2). Most educational interventions increased cancer screening knowledge but only some increased screening participation. The environmental interventions showed promising but non-significant effects on screening participation. Despite critical gaps in the literature, this review provides a foundation to develop interventions needed to improve cancer screening participation among people with physical and/or sensory disability.

Journal of Cancer Education
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Cancer Council Victoria (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), University of Glasgow (GB)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.