Understanding and Responding to Stalking(II)

This study is based on the recognition that the domestic response to stalking remains focused on punishment and fails to sufficiently reflect offenders’ psychosocial characteristics and risks of recidivism. To address this limitation, the study analyzed 241 stalking offenders, including incarcerated individuals as well as those subject to fines or probation.<br/> Most offenders were male and commonly exhibited prior criminal records, alcohol or substance abuse, mental health issues, and unstable employment. Stalking behaviors primarily involved repeated messaging, surveillance, and physical approaches. Among offender typologies, “Rejected Stalkers” showed the highest levels of violence and risk of reoffending.<br/> Risk assessment results identified obsession, threats, and repeated contact as key factors associated with elevated risk. Psychological assessments revealed prominent levels of depression, delusional thinking, and antisocial traits, alongside high stress and low social support.<br/> Based on these findings, the study highlights the need to strengthen police professionalism, establish a risk management system grounded in multi-agency collaboration, and introduce counseling and treatment referrals as part of provisional protective measures, emphasizing an integrated approach to stalking response.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36889/ijcj.2025.007
Primary Topic
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Responding to Stalking(II)

Jeongsook Yoon, Dahye Chang, Jee-Yearn Kim
International Journal of Criminal Justice
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
article

Understanding and Responding to Stalking(II)

Jeongsook Yoon, Dahye Chang, Jee-Yearn Kim
article en

Abstract

This study is based on the recognition that the domestic response to stalking remains focused on punishment and fails to sufficiently reflect offenders’ psychosocial characteristics and risks of recidivism. To address this limitation, the study analyzed 241 stalking offenders, including incarcerated individuals as well as those subject to fines or probation.<br/> Most offenders were male and commonly exhibited prior criminal records, alcohol or substance abuse, mental health issues, and unstable employment. Stalking behaviors primarily involved repeated messaging, surveillance, and physical approaches. Among offender typologies, “Rejected Stalkers” showed the highest levels of violence and risk of reoffending.<br/> Risk assessment results identified obsession, threats, and repeated contact as key factors associated with elevated risk. Psychological assessments revealed prominent levels of depression, delusional thinking, and antisocial traits, alongside high stress and low social support.<br/> Based on these findings, the study highlights the need to strengthen police professionalism, establish a risk management system grounded in multi-agency collaboration, and introduce counseling and treatment referrals as part of provisional protective measures, emphasizing an integrated approach to stalking response.

International Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.