Toward improved siting of wind–solar hybrid farms: A novel framework integrating multi-criteria decision making, machine learning–driven feature selection, and spatial clustering

Ensuring secure, affordable, and sustainable energy supply is a growing global challenge as rising demand and supply insecurity accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Hybrid wind–solar systems offer an effective solution by exploiting spatial and temporal resource complementarity, but their deployment critically depends on reliable site selection. Most multi-criteria decision analysis studies rely on a single weighting method, apply limited criteria evaluation, lack statistical validation, and rarely identify spatially coherent, investment-ready zones. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an integrated geographic decision-making framework for hybrid wind–solar siting that combines two expert-based weighting methods, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best-Worst Method (BWM) with an objective, data-driven weighting method, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and machine learning–assisted criterion screening. The framework was applied to Izmir Province, Türkiye. Suitability maps generated under alternative weighting methods were compared using spatially adjusted statistical tests, clustered into contiguous high-suitability zones using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering (HDBSCAN), converted into candidate-site polygons, and prioritized using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method. The results revealed pronounced differences across weighting methods. Highly or very highly suitable areas accounted for 33.27% (AHP) and 27.75% (BWM) of candidate sites, compared with 58.39% under CRITIC. Validation using 703 existing solar photovoltaic and wind turbine installations showed agreement rates of 77.81%, 72.83%, and 83.65%, respectively. The resulting outputs provide actionable decision-support information for regional planning and the identification of investment-ready hybrid wind–solar zones. • Geographic decision framework screens sites for hybrid wind-solar power farms. • Data-driven screening reduces 15 criteria to 9 key factors for clearer decisions. • Suitability maps are grouped into practical site polygons for planning use. • Multiple scoring and ranking runs identify sites that are robust across methods. • Results align with existing wind turbines and solar plants in the study region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127609
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward improved siting of wind–solar hybrid farms: A novel framework integrating multi-criteria decision making, machine learning–driven feature selection, and spatial clustering

Atakan Bilgili, Yasin Ferit Uguz, Melis Uzar
Applied Energy
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Toward improved siting of wind–solar hybrid farms: A novel framework integrating multi-criteria decision making, machine learning–driven feature selection, and spatial clustering

Atakan Bilgili, Yasin Ferit Uguz, Melis Uzar
article en

Abstract

Ensuring secure, affordable, and sustainable energy supply is a growing global challenge as rising demand and supply insecurity accelerate the transition to renewable energy. Hybrid wind–solar systems offer an effective solution by exploiting spatial and temporal resource complementarity, but their deployment critically depends on reliable site selection. Most multi-criteria decision analysis studies rely on a single weighting method, apply limited criteria evaluation, lack statistical validation, and rarely identify spatially coherent, investment-ready zones. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an integrated geographic decision-making framework for hybrid wind–solar siting that combines two expert-based weighting methods, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best-Worst Method (BWM) with an objective, data-driven weighting method, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and machine learning–assisted criterion screening. The framework was applied to Izmir Province, Türkiye. Suitability maps generated under alternative weighting methods were compared using spatially adjusted statistical tests, clustered into contiguous high-suitability zones using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering (HDBSCAN), converted into candidate-site polygons, and prioritized using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method. The results revealed pronounced differences across weighting methods. Highly or very highly suitable areas accounted for 33.27% (AHP) and 27.75% (BWM) of candidate sites, compared with 58.39% under CRITIC. Validation using 703 existing solar photovoltaic and wind turbine installations showed agreement rates of 77.81%, 72.83%, and 83.65%, respectively. The resulting outputs provide actionable decision-support information for regional planning and the identification of investment-ready hybrid wind–solar zones. • Geographic decision framework screens sites for hybrid wind-solar power farms. • Data-driven screening reduces 15 criteria to 9 key factors for clearer decisions. • Suitability maps are grouped into practical site polygons for planning use. • Multiple scoring and ranking runs identify sites that are robust across methods. • Results align with existing wind turbines and solar plants in the study region.

Applied EnergyVol. 411
Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.