Sensitivity analysis of Kriging to variogram model selection and spatial continuity direction in support of sustainable mineral resoursce management (SDGs 9 and 12)

The research examines how ordinary kriging reponds to changes in both the theoretical variogram model-Spherical, Exponential, and Gaussian-and the direction of spatial continuity. The analysis was carried out using 80 borehole samples containing galena (PbS) grades. Empirical variograms were built and fitted, and their influence on kriging estimation was examined through cross-validation using the correlation coefficien (r), coefficient of determination (r2), standard error (SE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The results show that different variogram models and anisotropy directions can noticeably shift the kriging output. Among all combinations, the Exponential model at 45° produced the most stable and convincing performance, with the highest correlation (r = 0.825, r² = 0.680) and the lowest RMSE (0.510). This pattern suggests that PbS mineralization in the study area demonstrates a moderate level of spatial continuity aligned with the main geological trend. The Gaussian model produced smoother surfaces but tended to reduce local variability, while the Spherical model showed comparatively higher residual errors. Overall, selecting an appropriate variogram model and anisotropy direction is essential for producing kriging estimates that are both geologically reasonable and statistically reliable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669601022/pdf
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis of Kriging to variogram model selection and spatial continuity direction in support of sustainable mineral resoursce management (SDGs 9 and 12)

Emil Salim Kahmi Leka, Eprilia Simamora, Indra Siregar, Epafras Meihaga et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Sensitivity analysis of Kriging to variogram model selection and spatial continuity direction in support of sustainable mineral resoursce management (SDGs 9 and 12)

Emil Salim Kahmi Leka, Eprilia Simamora, Indra Siregar, Epafras Meihaga, Shafa Maulidya Budiyono, Husna Toibiah
article en

Abstract

The research examines how ordinary kriging reponds to changes in both the theoretical variogram model-Spherical, Exponential, and Gaussian-and the direction of spatial continuity. The analysis was carried out using 80 borehole samples containing galena (PbS) grades. Empirical variograms were built and fitted, and their influence on kriging estimation was examined through cross-validation using the correlation coefficien (r), coefficient of determination (r2), standard error (SE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The results show that different variogram models and anisotropy directions can noticeably shift the kriging output. Among all combinations, the Exponential model at 45° produced the most stable and convincing performance, with the highest correlation (r = 0.825, r² = 0.680) and the lowest RMSE (0.510). This pattern suggests that PbS mineralization in the study area demonstrates a moderate level of spatial continuity aligned with the main geological trend. The Gaussian model produced smoother surfaces but tended to reduce local variability, while the Spherical model showed comparatively higher residual errors. Overall, selecting an appropriate variogram model and anisotropy direction is essential for producing kriging estimates that are both geologically reasonable and statistically reliable.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Ministrstvo za visoko šolstvo, znanost in tehnologijo, Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.