Evaluation of carbon sequestration by iron-rich slag materials

Mining and metalliferous alkaline waste offer an opportunity for carbon sequestration by trapping carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) through hydration, sorption, or precipitation. The objective of this paper was to determine the feasibility of two iron-rich slag materials for use as a substrate to sequester injected CO 2 . The physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of both samples were analyzed showing a larger particle size, smaller surface roughness, and higher porosity for S2 than S1. Both samples were injected with 10% v /v CO 2 in airtight media bottles that were agitated for 24 h with various initial moisture conditions. Both wastes exhibited high potential for carbon trapping with up to 92.5% and 99.5% CO 2 removal for samples S1 and S2, respectively. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, results showed that both samples showed precipitates of minor carbonate phases. S1 precipitated calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) and S2 precipitated CaCO 3 , magnesite (MgCO 3 ), and siderite (FeCO 3 ) achieving mineral trapping. However, the majority of solid phase CO 2 removal was attributed to chemical adsorption onto the metal-based surfaces of iron-rich slag materials. At 10% ( v /v) CO 2 , solid phase CO 2 trapping has the potential to remove 1000 and 1073 g CO 2 per tonne of S1 and S2, respectively. The results are promising for carbon trapping using metalliferous waste at low moisture conditions. • CO 2 capture by titanium slag achieved up to 99.5% CO 2 removal • CO 2 trapping achieved was up to 98.5% in the solid phase primarily via adsorption • Mineral trapping was as CaCO 3 and Fe 6 (OH) 12 CO 3 ∙ H 2 O • Liquid phase CO 2 removal was via solubility and mineral trapping

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.174903
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of carbon sequestration by iron-rich slag materials

Samantha M. Wilcox, Carmen Mihaela Neculita, Catherine N. Mulligan
Chemical Engineering Journal
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
article

Evaluation of carbon sequestration by iron-rich slag materials

Samantha M. Wilcox, Carmen Mihaela Neculita, Catherine N. Mulligan
article en

Abstract

Mining and metalliferous alkaline waste offer an opportunity for carbon sequestration by trapping carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) through hydration, sorption, or precipitation. The objective of this paper was to determine the feasibility of two iron-rich slag materials for use as a substrate to sequester injected CO 2 . The physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of both samples were analyzed showing a larger particle size, smaller surface roughness, and higher porosity for S2 than S1. Both samples were injected with 10% v /v CO 2 in airtight media bottles that were agitated for 24 h with various initial moisture conditions. Both wastes exhibited high potential for carbon trapping with up to 92.5% and 99.5% CO 2 removal for samples S1 and S2, respectively. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, results showed that both samples showed precipitates of minor carbonate phases. S1 precipitated calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) and S2 precipitated CaCO 3 , magnesite (MgCO 3 ), and siderite (FeCO 3 ) achieving mineral trapping. However, the majority of solid phase CO 2 removal was attributed to chemical adsorption onto the metal-based surfaces of iron-rich slag materials. At 10% ( v /v) CO 2 , solid phase CO 2 trapping has the potential to remove 1000 and 1073 g CO 2 per tonne of S1 and S2, respectively. The results are promising for carbon trapping using metalliferous waste at low moisture conditions. • CO 2 capture by titanium slag achieved up to 99.5% CO 2 removal • CO 2 trapping achieved was up to 98.5% in the solid phase primarily via adsorption • Mineral trapping was as CaCO 3 and Fe 6 (OH) 12 CO 3 ∙ H 2 O • Liquid phase CO 2 removal was via solubility and mineral trapping

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 533
Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Concordia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.