Directed technical change and the potential fossil fuel technology trap

Achieving the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goal 13 requires a rapid global transition away from fossil fuels. However, for resource-rich nations, high export revenues create a complex trade-off between immediate economic gains and long-term sustainability. This paper investigates whether the profitability of fossil fuel exports induces a “fossil fuel technology trap”, where innovation resources are inefficiently locked into the extraction sector, hampering the necessary switch to clean energy. We develop a directed technical change model specifically calibrated for a small, open economy. The framework analyzes the transitional dynamics of R&D allocation between dirty and clean energy sectors under increasing extraction costs for dirty resources, reflecting the structural dilemmas facing resource-exporting emerging and developed economies during the critical transition period toward a carbon-neutral global market. Our results demonstrate that market forces alone fail to allocate R&D efficiently; the economy tends to over-invest in fossil fuel technologies to maximize short-term export rents, leading to welfare losses. To avoid this fossil fuel technology trap, our policy analysis suggests that governments must implement active R&D reallocation policies that favor clean innovation significantly earlier than market signals would suggest. • Using R&D to export more fossil fuels may create a fossil technology trap. • Reallocating R&D to clean energy removes the trap and boosts GDP. • Both subsidizing clean energy R&D and taxing fossil fuel extraction are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109223
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Directed technical change and the potential fossil fuel technology trap

Tom‐Reiel Heggedal, Mads Greaker, Knut Einar Rosendahl
Energy Economics
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
article

Directed technical change and the potential fossil fuel technology trap

Tom‐Reiel Heggedal, Mads Greaker, Knut Einar Rosendahl
article en

Abstract

Achieving the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goal 13 requires a rapid global transition away from fossil fuels. However, for resource-rich nations, high export revenues create a complex trade-off between immediate economic gains and long-term sustainability. This paper investigates whether the profitability of fossil fuel exports induces a “fossil fuel technology trap”, where innovation resources are inefficiently locked into the extraction sector, hampering the necessary switch to clean energy. We develop a directed technical change model specifically calibrated for a small, open economy. The framework analyzes the transitional dynamics of R&D allocation between dirty and clean energy sectors under increasing extraction costs for dirty resources, reflecting the structural dilemmas facing resource-exporting emerging and developed economies during the critical transition period toward a carbon-neutral global market. Our results demonstrate that market forces alone fail to allocate R&D efficiently; the economy tends to over-invest in fossil fuel technologies to maximize short-term export rents, leading to welfare losses. To avoid this fossil fuel technology trap, our policy analysis suggests that governments must implement active R&D reallocation policies that favor clean innovation significantly earlier than market signals would suggest. • Using R&D to export more fossil fuels may create a fossil technology trap. • Reallocating R&D to clean energy removes the trap and boosts GDP. • Both subsidizing clean energy R&D and taxing fossil fuel extraction are needed.

Energy EconomicsVol. 157
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.