Bioethanol revolution: Integrating feedstock innovation with energy-efficient processes under life cycle assessment

The global energy system remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, increasing the need for renewable liquid alternatives. Bioethanol is a major gasoline substitute that can reduce petroleum use in transport by 5–27% under typical blending mandates (E10–E27) and up to 100% on an energy basis in neat ethanol applications (E100). However, first-generation production from food crops raises economic and food–fuel concerns. This review synthesizes recent advances in second- and third-generation bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural and industrial residues, and microalgae, with emphasis on process intensification and sustainability performance. A comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis evaluate pathways based on net energy ratio, life-cycle GHG emissions, and production cost. Lignocellulosic ethanol can achieve 40–91% GHG reductions relative to gasoline, though costs remain variable (∼$0.21–$1.25/L). Mature sugar/starch routes show competitive costs (∼$0.34–$0.47/L) with significant carbon benefits when land-use change is minimized. Waste/residue pathways emerge as the most robust near-term option, while microalgae-based ethanol remains limited by energy and cost constraints (NER < 1; ∼$0.76–$0.91/L). Overall, this review identifies the most viable deployment routes and key research priorities for advancing low-carbon bioethanol systems. • Integrates novel feedstocks with modern bioethanol conversion technologies. • Reviews enzymatic, thermochemical, and microbial innovations for 2G ethanol. • Compares SSF, SSCF, and CBP processes for cost-effective bioethanol yield. • Includes life cycle assessment of various bioethanol production pathways. • Identifies scalable and sustainable strategies for future bioethanol deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass Futures
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100034
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioethanol revolution: Integrating feedstock innovation with energy-efficient processes under life cycle assessment

Mustafa M. Amin, Rasheed Hamid Mohammed Ibrahim, Muhammad N. Siddiquee, Mosaab A. Elbager et al.
Biomass Futures
Biofuel production and bioconversion
article

Bioethanol revolution: Integrating feedstock innovation with energy-efficient processes under life cycle assessment

Mustafa M. Amin, Rasheed Hamid Mohammed Ibrahim, Muhammad N. Siddiquee, Mosaab A. Elbager, Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel, Shaikh Abdur Razzak
article en

Abstract

The global energy system remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, increasing the need for renewable liquid alternatives. Bioethanol is a major gasoline substitute that can reduce petroleum use in transport by 5–27% under typical blending mandates (E10–E27) and up to 100% on an energy basis in neat ethanol applications (E100). However, first-generation production from food crops raises economic and food–fuel concerns. This review synthesizes recent advances in second- and third-generation bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural and industrial residues, and microalgae, with emphasis on process intensification and sustainability performance. A comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis evaluate pathways based on net energy ratio, life-cycle GHG emissions, and production cost. Lignocellulosic ethanol can achieve 40–91% GHG reductions relative to gasoline, though costs remain variable (∼$0.21–$1.25/L). Mature sugar/starch routes show competitive costs (∼$0.34–$0.47/L) with significant carbon benefits when land-use change is minimized. Waste/residue pathways emerge as the most robust near-term option, while microalgae-based ethanol remains limited by energy and cost constraints (NER < 1; ∼$0.76–$0.91/L). Overall, this review identifies the most viable deployment routes and key research priorities for advancing low-carbon bioethanol systems. • Integrates novel feedstocks with modern bioethanol conversion technologies. • Reviews enzymatic, thermochemical, and microbial innovations for 2G ethanol. • Compares SSF, SSCF, and CBP processes for cost-effective bioethanol yield. • Includes life cycle assessment of various bioethanol production pathways. • Identifies scalable and sustainable strategies for future bioethanol deployment.

Biomass FuturesVol. 2
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.