Development and evaluation of a 15-item health literacy classification model using integrated psychometric approaches in China

Health literacy is a critical determinant of public health. In China, the 56-item national questionnaire limits large-scale implementation due to its length. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief health literacy classification model by integrating psychometric evaluation with classification modeling. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 19,092 participants in Ningbo, China (2022–2024). The 56-item questionnaire was reduced using item response theory, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis. Selected items and demographic variables were further refined using LASSO regression and Bayesian Information Criterion based logistic modeling. Model performance was assessed through area under the curve (AUC) and calibration in temporal testing. Fifteen items met all psychometric criteria (Cronbach’s α = 0.840). LASSO retained 19 variables; final modeling yielded 17 variables. The nomogram-based model showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.952 training; 0.949 testing). Sensitivity and specificity exceeded 86%, with negative predictive value over 93%. Calibration remained strong with minimal performance degradation. The evaluated 15-item model offers a brief, reliable alternative to the national questionnaire. Its high classification performance and reduced burden support integration into health surveillance systems and electronic health records.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26661-5
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and evaluation of a 15-item health literacy classification model using integrated psychometric approaches in China

Zhenbo Tao, Shige Ding, Lingwei Chen, Qianqian Xu et al.
BMC Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Development and evaluation of a 15-item health literacy classification model using integrated psychometric approaches in China

Zhenbo Tao, Shige Ding, Lingwei Chen, Qianqian Xu, Yingying Zhu, Ying Dong
article en

Abstract

Health literacy is a critical determinant of public health. In China, the 56-item national questionnaire limits large-scale implementation due to its length. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief health literacy classification model by integrating psychometric evaluation with classification modeling. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 19,092 participants in Ningbo, China (2022–2024). The 56-item questionnaire was reduced using item response theory, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis. Selected items and demographic variables were further refined using LASSO regression and Bayesian Information Criterion based logistic modeling. Model performance was assessed through area under the curve (AUC) and calibration in temporal testing. Fifteen items met all psychometric criteria (Cronbach’s α = 0.840). LASSO retained 19 variables; final modeling yielded 17 variables. The nomogram-based model showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.952 training; 0.949 testing). Sensitivity and specificity exceeded 86%, with negative predictive value over 93%. Calibration remained strong with minimal performance degradation. The evaluated 15-item model offers a brief, reliable alternative to the national questionnaire. Its high classification performance and reduced burden support integration into health surveillance systems and electronic health records.

BMC Public Health
Ningbo Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.