Comparative analysis of numerical methods for predicting aerodynamic performance of floating offshore wind turbines in tilted conditions

This study evaluates the aerodynamic performance of a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) under tilted conditions using four numerical approaches: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Actuator Line Method (ALM), Blade Element Momentum (BEM) method, and Free-Vortex Wake (FVW) method. The aim is to assess their accuracy and efficiency in predicting thrust, torque, and wake characteristics under tilt and a range of surge and pitch motions. CFD simulations were systematically verified through grid and time-step sensitivity analyses, and all numerical results were compared against experimental data for validation. The results show that BEM tends to overpredict aerodynamic loads, especially torque fluctuations under pitch motions. FVW improves mean thrust and torque predictions but still overestimates torque fluctuations. ALM is sensitive to tilt angles, leading to decreased accuracy at larger tilts. Aerodynamic loads from all methods exhibit a linear dependence on motion amplitude and frequency. CFD and ALM produce similar wake deficit trends, though ALM consistently underestimates the deficits. This comparative study quantifies the predictive performance of different numerical methods for FOWTs under dynamic and tilted conditions, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The findings provide guidance for selecting appropriate modeling approaches depending on the desired balance between accuracy and computational cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2026.104995
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of numerical methods for predicting aerodynamic performance of floating offshore wind turbines in tilted conditions

Changqing Jiang, Uwe Ritschel, Youjun Yang, Qian Gao
Applied Ocean Research
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
article

Comparative analysis of numerical methods for predicting aerodynamic performance of floating offshore wind turbines in tilted conditions

Changqing Jiang, Uwe Ritschel, Youjun Yang, Qian Gao
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the aerodynamic performance of a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) under tilted conditions using four numerical approaches: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Actuator Line Method (ALM), Blade Element Momentum (BEM) method, and Free-Vortex Wake (FVW) method. The aim is to assess their accuracy and efficiency in predicting thrust, torque, and wake characteristics under tilt and a range of surge and pitch motions. CFD simulations were systematically verified through grid and time-step sensitivity analyses, and all numerical results were compared against experimental data for validation. The results show that BEM tends to overpredict aerodynamic loads, especially torque fluctuations under pitch motions. FVW improves mean thrust and torque predictions but still overestimates torque fluctuations. ALM is sensitive to tilt angles, leading to decreased accuracy at larger tilts. Aerodynamic loads from all methods exhibit a linear dependence on motion amplitude and frequency. CFD and ALM produce similar wake deficit trends, though ALM consistently underestimates the deficits. This comparative study quantifies the predictive performance of different numerical methods for FOWTs under dynamic and tilted conditions, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The findings provide guidance for selecting appropriate modeling approaches depending on the desired balance between accuracy and computational cost.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 169
University of Rostock (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.