Resilience: The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Policymaking

Abstract Recent crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions around the world have highlighted the need to incorporate resilience as a key objective of public policy. However, existing literature in resilience is highly fragmented, and cannot successfully provide an answer to key pressing policy issues. In this paper, we analyze how resilience is understood and analyzed in the sustainability, economics, and management literatures. We highlight similarities and differences in resilience studies across the three fields, and some limitations which may arise when trying to use such studies to inform policymaking. We propose a research agenda for future policy-oriented resilience studies which aims to tackle some of the gaps of current work. We argue that the ultimate goal should be to create large-scale simulation models which are able to integrate economic, environmental, and societal considerations. To reach that goal, more interdisciplinary work is needed to understand the interdependencies among systems, and to create a robust data infrastructure which can support policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-026-00813-6
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience: The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Policymaking

Jaime Bonnín Roca, Tongle Si, Pedro Senna
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Regional resilience and development
article

Resilience: The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Policymaking

Jaime Bonnín Roca, Tongle Si, Pedro Senna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions around the world have highlighted the need to incorporate resilience as a key objective of public policy. However, existing literature in resilience is highly fragmented, and cannot successfully provide an answer to key pressing policy issues. In this paper, we analyze how resilience is understood and analyzed in the sustainability, economics, and management literatures. We highlight similarities and differences in resilience studies across the three fields, and some limitations which may arise when trying to use such studies to inform policymaking. We propose a research agenda for future policy-oriented resilience studies which aims to tackle some of the gaps of current work. We argue that the ultimate goal should be to create large-scale simulation models which are able to integrate economic, environmental, and societal considerations. To reach that goal, more interdisciplinary work is needed to understand the interdependencies among systems, and to create a robust data infrastructure which can support policymaking.

Circular Economy and SustainabilityVol. 6(2)
INESC TEC (PT), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Regional resilience and development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.