Clinical identification and classification of scanning errors in intraoral digital scans

To systematically identify and systemize scanning errors encountered in clinical practice using a classification framework applied to intraoral scans (IOS). A retrospective review of IOS was conducted in a private prosthodontic and implantology practice. All scans were examined for recognizable errors grouped into four main categories: (1) hardware selection [reliability-related errors (scanner selection) and geometry distortions (implant scan body or ISB selection)], (2) software selection and processing (scanning noise, ISB overcontouring, and shape alteration), (3) patient-related (humidity errors and scanning artifact), and (4) operator related [prescan preparation-related errors: bridge errors, fuzzy finish line errors, and tissue attached errors; scanning related: mesh hole errors, stitching errors, reliability errors, umbrella effect errors, distance errors, and distortion errors (scanning strategy)]. Clinical screenshots were collected for each error type and correlated with scanning conditions, patient-related factors, and operator experience level. All error categories were observed in clinical practice. Mesh holes and distance discrepancies were the most common, particularly in full-arch scans and around ISBs. Reliability errors were specific to scanners offering real-time scan confidence indicators. Umbrella and ISB-related errors frequently stemmed from insufficient cutting or poor rescanning techniques. Humidity scanning errors occur when moisture is present on the scanned surface, so drying the area and using a colorless visualization mode can help improve scan accuracy. Visual documentation of each error type has been compiled for educational and calibration purposes. Systematically identifying and classifying operator-related scanning errors in daily practice enables a deeper understanding of the human factors affecting IOS accuracy. These findings highlight the importance of structured error awareness and targeted operator training to enhance scan reliability in restorative and implant workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106365
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical identification and classification of scanning errors in intraoral digital scans

M Meleşcanu Imre, Lucian Toma Ciocan, Vlad Gabriel Vasilescu, Silviu Mirel Pituru
Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Clinical identification and classification of scanning errors in intraoral digital scans

M Meleşcanu Imre, Lucian Toma Ciocan, Vlad Gabriel Vasilescu, Silviu Mirel Pituru
article en

Abstract

To systematically identify and systemize scanning errors encountered in clinical practice using a classification framework applied to intraoral scans (IOS). A retrospective review of IOS was conducted in a private prosthodontic and implantology practice. All scans were examined for recognizable errors grouped into four main categories: (1) hardware selection [reliability-related errors (scanner selection) and geometry distortions (implant scan body or ISB selection)], (2) software selection and processing (scanning noise, ISB overcontouring, and shape alteration), (3) patient-related (humidity errors and scanning artifact), and (4) operator related [prescan preparation-related errors: bridge errors, fuzzy finish line errors, and tissue attached errors; scanning related: mesh hole errors, stitching errors, reliability errors, umbrella effect errors, distance errors, and distortion errors (scanning strategy)]. Clinical screenshots were collected for each error type and correlated with scanning conditions, patient-related factors, and operator experience level. All error categories were observed in clinical practice. Mesh holes and distance discrepancies were the most common, particularly in full-arch scans and around ISBs. Reliability errors were specific to scanners offering real-time scan confidence indicators. Umbrella and ISB-related errors frequently stemmed from insufficient cutting or poor rescanning techniques. Humidity scanning errors occur when moisture is present on the scanned surface, so drying the area and using a colorless visualization mode can help improve scan accuracy. Visual documentation of each error type has been compiled for educational and calibration purposes. Systematically identifying and classifying operator-related scanning errors in daily practice enables a deeper understanding of the human factors affecting IOS accuracy. These findings highlight the importance of structured error awareness and targeted operator training to enhance scan reliability in restorative and implant workflows.

Journal of DentistryVol. 167
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.