The Goldilocks Effect: How the “Just Right” Writing Styles of Global Corporate Responsibility Frameworks Shapes Their Use by Businesses

ABSTRACT The 21st century has witnessed a surge in the number of global corporate responsibility (GCR) frameworks issued by international organizations (IOs). Our study investigates whether and to what extent these frameworks shape businesses' Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communications. Integrating insights from computational linguistics, we propose that the textual characteristics of GCR frameworks, mainly how they are written, play a crucial role in determining their use by businesses. Using natural language processing, we analyze CSR communications from 320 firms, encompassing 4025 documents, to determine the extent of their incorporation of text from GCR frameworks. The study identifies a “Goldilocks effect,” whereby businesses' use of GCR framework is greatest when the language is neither overly simple nor excessively complex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70133
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Goldilocks Effect: How the “Just Right” Writing Styles of Global Corporate Responsibility Frameworks Shapes Their Use by Businesses

Robyn; id_orcid 0000-0003-4215-2320 Klingler-Vidra, Adam Chalmers
Regulation & Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Goldilocks Effect: How the “Just Right” Writing Styles of Global Corporate Responsibility Frameworks Shapes Their Use by Businesses

Robyn; id_orcid 0000-0003-4215-2320 Klingler-Vidra, Adam Chalmers
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 21st century has witnessed a surge in the number of global corporate responsibility (GCR) frameworks issued by international organizations (IOs). Our study investigates whether and to what extent these frameworks shape businesses' Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communications. Integrating insights from computational linguistics, we propose that the textual characteristics of GCR frameworks, mainly how they are written, play a crucial role in determining their use by businesses. Using natural language processing, we analyze CSR communications from 320 firms, encompassing 4025 documents, to determine the extent of their incorporation of text from GCR frameworks. The study identifies a “Goldilocks effect,” whereby businesses' use of GCR framework is greatest when the language is neither overly simple nor excessively complex.

Regulation & Governance
King's College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
University of Warwick, King's College London
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.