On the validity of Lovász’s inequality for induced star-perfect graphs

Abstract Let $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> be a family of graphs. For a graph G , define $\theta _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> as the minimum number of induced subgraphs of G , each isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> , needed to cover $V(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , and $\alpha _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> as the maximum number of vertices in G such that no two are contained in an induced subgraph of G isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> . In this paper, we focus on the fundamental inequality of graphs, $\theta _{F}(G) \geq \alpha _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , and the characterization of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -perfect graphs, where equality holds for all induced subgraphs. Specifically, we investigate induced star-perfect graphs, where $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the family of stars and $\omega _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ω</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> is the size of a maximum induced star in G . The characterization of induced star-perfect graphs by a set of forbidden induced subgraphs was conjectured by Ravindra in 2011 and was proved in 2024. Here, we present a shorter proof of this characterization, applying our main result that the inequality $\alpha _{F}(H) \omega _{F}(H) \geq |V(H)|$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ω</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> </mml:math> holds for every induced subgraph H of an induced star-perfect graph.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-026-03451-6
Primary Topic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the validity of Lovász’s inequality for induced star-perfect graphs

James Alex, Louis Caccetta
Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
article

On the validity of Lovász’s inequality for induced star-perfect graphs

James Alex, Louis Caccetta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Let $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> be a family of graphs. For a graph G , define $\theta _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> as the minimum number of induced subgraphs of G , each isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> , needed to cover $V(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , and $\alpha _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> as the maximum number of vertices in G such that no two are contained in an induced subgraph of G isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> . In this paper, we focus on the fundamental inequality of graphs, $\theta _{F}(G) \geq \alpha _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , and the characterization of $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -perfect graphs, where equality holds for all induced subgraphs. Specifically, we investigate induced star-perfect graphs, where $\mathcal{F}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> is the family of stars and $\omega _{F}(G)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ω</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:math> is the size of a maximum induced star in G . The characterization of induced star-perfect graphs by a set of forbidden induced subgraphs was conjectured by Ravindra in 2011 and was proved in 2024. Here, we present a shorter proof of this characterization, applying our main result that the inequality $\alpha _{F}(H) \omega _{F}(H) \geq |V(H)|$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ω</mml:mi> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> </mml:math> holds for every induced subgraph H of an induced star-perfect graph.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications
Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.