Omitting axillary lymph node dissection or not? A multicenter, retrospective study for breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib since the SENOMAC trial

The SENOMAC trial has resolved the longstanding clinical debate regarding the omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, the MonarchE trial demonstrated the benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. The inclusion criteria of MonarchE, particularly the requirement for pN2 status, may necessitate reconsideration of surgical interventions. This study retrospectively included 711 patients with cT1-2N0M0, HR+/HER2-, and 1–2 positive SLNs in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University breast cancer database. All patients underwent further ALND. The study evaluated the proportion of patients with pathological stage upgrading to pN2 or pN3 after ALND, analyzed the independent predictors of high lymph node burden, and further evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of the SENOMAC nomogram in predicting high nodal burden. Among the 711 patients, 17.6% were confirmed to be at pN2 or pN3 stage by ALND, meeting the criteria for adjuvant abemaciclib treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of positive SLNs (OR = 5.267, 95% CI: 3.487–7.958) and the number of removed SLNs (OR = 0.839, 95% CI: 0.752–0.927) and tumor size (OR = 2.409, 95% CI: 1.615–3.594) were independent risk factors for predicting pN2/pN3. Patients with pN2-pN3 disease had significantly worse recurrence-free survival compared to those with pN1 disease (HR = 4.958, 95% CI: 1.786–13.762, p = 0.0017). The predictive performance of the SENOMAC nomogram in this cohort was AUC = 0.763 (95% CI: 0.712–0.814). 17.6% of patients with 1–2 positive SLNs and no additional high-risk factors were reclassified as high nodal burden after ALND. Given the relatively low prevalence of these cases, routinely performing ALND on all such patients has limited clinical benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04260-3
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Omitting axillary lymph node dissection or not? A multicenter, retrospective study for breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib since the SENOMAC trial

Weiqi Gao, Zihao Xu, Kunwei Shen, Chao Hu et al.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Omitting axillary lymph node dissection or not? A multicenter, retrospective study for breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib since the SENOMAC trial

Weiqi Gao, Zihao Xu, Kunwei Shen, Chao Hu, Yufei Zeng
article en

Abstract

The SENOMAC trial has resolved the longstanding clinical debate regarding the omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, the MonarchE trial demonstrated the benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. The inclusion criteria of MonarchE, particularly the requirement for pN2 status, may necessitate reconsideration of surgical interventions. This study retrospectively included 711 patients with cT1-2N0M0, HR+/HER2-, and 1–2 positive SLNs in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University breast cancer database. All patients underwent further ALND. The study evaluated the proportion of patients with pathological stage upgrading to pN2 or pN3 after ALND, analyzed the independent predictors of high lymph node burden, and further evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of the SENOMAC nomogram in predicting high nodal burden. Among the 711 patients, 17.6% were confirmed to be at pN2 or pN3 stage by ALND, meeting the criteria for adjuvant abemaciclib treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of positive SLNs (OR = 5.267, 95% CI: 3.487–7.958) and the number of removed SLNs (OR = 0.839, 95% CI: 0.752–0.927) and tumor size (OR = 2.409, 95% CI: 1.615–3.594) were independent risk factors for predicting pN2/pN3. Patients with pN2-pN3 disease had significantly worse recurrence-free survival compared to those with pN1 disease (HR = 4.958, 95% CI: 1.786–13.762, p = 0.0017). The predictive performance of the SENOMAC nomogram in this cohort was AUC = 0.763 (95% CI: 0.712–0.814). 17.6% of patients with 1–2 positive SLNs and no additional high-risk factors were reclassified as high nodal burden after ALND. Given the relatively low prevalence of these cases, routinely performing ALND on all such patients has limited clinical benefit.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.