The Geoeconomics of Critical Minerals: Implications of a Trump–Central Asia Framework Agreement

Abstract: China’s aggressive geoeconomic strategy to dominate global supplies of critical minerals and rare earth elements (REEs) prompted President Trump to declare a national emergency and seek alternative sources, including from the vast, untapped reserves of Central Asia. Central Asians are keen to attract American investment while China and Russia want to exclude the United States from the region. I test the hypothesis that private investment in Central Asia to help meet the United States’ accelerating demand is a credible alternative to sourcing from allied democratic states. Three countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan) are examined for access to the critical minerals subject to Chinese export restrictions (gallium, germanium and antimony).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œSAIS review of international affairs
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2025.a984723
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Geoeconomics of Critical Minerals: Implications of a Trump–Central Asia Framework Agreement

Marsha McGraw Olive
˜The œSAIS review of international affairs
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

The Geoeconomics of Critical Minerals: Implications of a Trump–Central Asia Framework Agreement

Marsha McGraw Olive
article en

Abstract

Abstract: China’s aggressive geoeconomic strategy to dominate global supplies of critical minerals and rare earth elements (REEs) prompted President Trump to declare a national emergency and seek alternative sources, including from the vast, untapped reserves of Central Asia. Central Asians are keen to attract American investment while China and Russia want to exclude the United States from the region. I test the hypothesis that private investment in Central Asia to help meet the United States’ accelerating demand is a credible alternative to sourcing from allied democratic states. Three countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan) are examined for access to the critical minerals subject to Chinese export restrictions (gallium, germanium and antimony).

˜The œSAIS review of international affairsVol. 45(2)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.