Use of artificial intelligence–enhanced virtual patients in educational approaches to medical interview training: a systematic review

Effective communication and empathy are essential for professional–patient relationships, patient care, and the therapeutic alliance. With the increasing use of artificial intelligence-assisted virtual patients (AI-VPs), new opportunities to improve interview training are observed. This systematic review assesses the educational use, benefits, and limitations of AI-VPs in clinical interview training for healthcare professionals and students. Following PRISMA recommendations, the review involved a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of papers was assessed using the MMAT 2018. The findings suggest that AI-VPs can improve empathy, communication, and clinical reasoning, as well as promote perceived self-efficacy, reduce anxiety, and enhance engagement through immersive experiences. However, questions remain about the transferability of these skills to clinical practice. The studies show a lack of consistent theoretical frameworks and standardized outcome measures. While feedback is widely used, it is not formalized. Technical limitations, such as issues with speech recognition and nonverbal communication, can disrupt immersion. AI-VPs represent a promising educational tool for initial interview training, as it creates learning environments that are scalable, standardized, and interactive. A step-by-step approach, beginning with standardized patients and progressing to real patients, may optimize skill acquisition. Robust longitudinal studies and cost–benefit analyses are needed to support these findings. Although AI-VPs can improve training in interpersonal and communication skills, further work is needed to validate its clinical impact and educational design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08804-9
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of artificial intelligence–enhanced virtual patients in educational approaches to medical interview training: a systematic review

Ludovic Samalin, Pierre Philip, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Valentin Gilbert
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Use of artificial intelligence–enhanced virtual patients in educational approaches to medical interview training: a systematic review

Ludovic Samalin, Pierre Philip, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Valentin Gilbert
article en

Abstract

Effective communication and empathy are essential for professional–patient relationships, patient care, and the therapeutic alliance. With the increasing use of artificial intelligence-assisted virtual patients (AI-VPs), new opportunities to improve interview training are observed. This systematic review assesses the educational use, benefits, and limitations of AI-VPs in clinical interview training for healthcare professionals and students. Following PRISMA recommendations, the review involved a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of papers was assessed using the MMAT 2018. The findings suggest that AI-VPs can improve empathy, communication, and clinical reasoning, as well as promote perceived self-efficacy, reduce anxiety, and enhance engagement through immersive experiences. However, questions remain about the transferability of these skills to clinical practice. The studies show a lack of consistent theoretical frameworks and standardized outcome measures. While feedback is widely used, it is not formalized. Technical limitations, such as issues with speech recognition and nonverbal communication, can disrupt immersion. AI-VPs represent a promising educational tool for initial interview training, as it creates learning environments that are scalable, standardized, and interactive. A step-by-step approach, beginning with standardized patients and progressing to real patients, may optimize skill acquisition. Robust longitudinal studies and cost–benefit analyses are needed to support these findings. Although AI-VPs can improve training in interpersonal and communication skills, further work is needed to validate its clinical impact and educational design.

BMC Medical Education
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Institut Pascal (FR), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Sigma Clermont (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.