Confidently Uncertain: Validating Satellite ECV Measurement Uncertainty Estimates

The importance of uncertainty estimates for Essential Climate Variable (ECV) data records is well recognized. Most ECV observing systems now estimate and report uncertainties as part of the measurement and retrieval procedure instead of leaving uncertainty characterization to a diagnostic "ex-post" validation/evaluation procedure. This paper focuses on the validation or evaluation of these prognostic “ex-ante" uncertainties provided with satellite ECV climate data records. In recent years, established validation protocols (primarily focused on the validation of the measurements themselves) have been extended to provide feedback on the prognostic uncertainties. Moreover, dedicated methods for uncertainty validation have been developed and applied across the Earth observation community. In this review, we classify, describe, and illustrate these approaches under three categories: (1) those relying on comparison to independent in-situ or other ground-based reference data, (2) those exploiting self-co-locations, i.e., the comparison between consecutive measurements by the same instrument under appropriate conditions, and (3) those integrating a multitude of correlative (satellite) data sets. The principles behind each method are described with a common nomenclature, facilitating a clear identification of strengths and weaknesses, and the illustrations are chosen to cover the three Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) ECV domains (atmosphere, ocean, terrestrial) toward the aim of facilitating cross-domain knowledge transfer. Finally, the most common and critical gaps and challenges are listed to support the scoping of future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surveys in Geophysics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09939-6
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidently Uncertain: Validating Satellite ECV Measurement Uncertainty Estimates

Arno Keppens, Adam C. Povey, Tijl Verhoelst, Claire E. Bulgin et al.
Surveys in Geophysics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Confidently Uncertain: Validating Satellite ECV Measurement Uncertainty Estimates

Arno Keppens, Adam C. Povey, Tijl Verhoelst, Claire E. Bulgin, Steven Compernolle, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Alexander Gruber
article en

Abstract

The importance of uncertainty estimates for Essential Climate Variable (ECV) data records is well recognized. Most ECV observing systems now estimate and report uncertainties as part of the measurement and retrieval procedure instead of leaving uncertainty characterization to a diagnostic "ex-post" validation/evaluation procedure. This paper focuses on the validation or evaluation of these prognostic “ex-ante" uncertainties provided with satellite ECV climate data records. In recent years, established validation protocols (primarily focused on the validation of the measurements themselves) have been extended to provide feedback on the prognostic uncertainties. Moreover, dedicated methods for uncertainty validation have been developed and applied across the Earth observation community. In this review, we classify, describe, and illustrate these approaches under three categories: (1) those relying on comparison to independent in-situ or other ground-based reference data, (2) those exploiting self-co-locations, i.e., the comparison between consecutive measurements by the same instrument under appropriate conditions, and (3) those integrating a multitude of correlative (satellite) data sets. The principles behind each method are described with a common nomenclature, facilitating a clear identification of strengths and weaknesses, and the illustrations are chosen to cover the three Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) ECV domains (atmosphere, ocean, terrestrial) toward the aim of facilitating cross-domain knowledge transfer. Finally, the most common and critical gaps and challenges are listed to support the scoping of future work.

Surveys in Geophysics
TU Wien (AT), Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Natural Environment Research Council, National Centre for Earth Observation
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.