Würdewidrig und Grund des Bösen? Kant zur „inneren Lüge“

Abstract Recent scholarship on Kant often asserts that he was keenly aware of the problem of self-deception and considered it to be systematically necessary, for example, as a means of illuminating the possibility of acting against the moral law. It is also suggested that Kant’s preferred term for self-deception is the ,inner lie‘. However, this paper argues that, while Kant’s notion of the ,inner lie‘ does indeed identify a fundamental problem in moral philosophy, it bears little relation to common intuitions and interpretations of self-deception, or to diverse and often conflicting scholarly readings of Kant’s conception of it. Furthermore, this paper explains why Kant can legitimately attribute systematic significance to the ,inner lie‘ when clarifying the possibility of violating one’s duty, and why he considers the phenomenon to entail a profound ,Wegwerfung‘ (rejection) of human dignity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kant-Studien
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-0047
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Würdewidrig und Grund des Bösen? Kant zur „inneren Lüge“

Simone Neuber
Kant-Studien
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Würdewidrig und Grund des Bösen? Kant zur „inneren Lüge“

Simone Neuber
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent scholarship on Kant often asserts that he was keenly aware of the problem of self-deception and considered it to be systematically necessary, for example, as a means of illuminating the possibility of acting against the moral law. It is also suggested that Kant’s preferred term for self-deception is the ,inner lie‘. However, this paper argues that, while Kant’s notion of the ,inner lie‘ does indeed identify a fundamental problem in moral philosophy, it bears little relation to common intuitions and interpretations of self-deception, or to diverse and often conflicting scholarly readings of Kant’s conception of it. Furthermore, this paper explains why Kant can legitimately attribute systematic significance to the ,inner lie‘ when clarifying the possibility of violating one’s duty, and why he considers the phenomenon to entail a profound ,Wegwerfung‘ (rejection) of human dignity.

Kant-StudienVol. 117(1)
Institut für Psychologische Psychotherapie (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.