Kant on Complete and Thoroughgoing Determination

Abstract In section two of the Ideal of Pure Reason in the Critique of Pure Reason , Kant provides an intricate attempt to ground possibility in the idea of “all of reality” ( omnitudo realitiatis ). The section begins with two principles, 1) the principle of determinability and 2) the principle of thoroughgoing determination. How the two principles work and relate to each other has been a matter of scholarly debate. The paper contributes to this debate first by outlining Kant’s different senses of ‘determination’. It then uses the senses to suggest a distinction between thoroughgoing determination and complete determination. The distinction enables a reading of the first moves of Kant’s argument in the section. Then the paper places Kant’s use of complete determination in the context of his theory of cognition and criticism of the Leibnizian rationalist tradition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kant-Studien
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-0030
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant on Complete and Thoroughgoing Determination

Zachary Biondi
Kant-Studien
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant on Complete and Thoroughgoing Determination

Zachary Biondi
article en

Abstract

Abstract In section two of the Ideal of Pure Reason in the Critique of Pure Reason , Kant provides an intricate attempt to ground possibility in the idea of “all of reality” ( omnitudo realitiatis ). The section begins with two principles, 1) the principle of determinability and 2) the principle of thoroughgoing determination. How the two principles work and relate to each other has been a matter of scholarly debate. The paper contributes to this debate first by outlining Kant’s different senses of ‘determination’. It then uses the senses to suggest a distinction between thoroughgoing determination and complete determination. The distinction enables a reading of the first moves of Kant’s argument in the section. Then the paper places Kant’s use of complete determination in the context of his theory of cognition and criticism of the Leibnizian rationalist tradition.

Kant-StudienVol. 117(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.