The Political Frontier of Rubber Plantations in Northeastern Thailand

The promotion of rubber plantations in Northeastern Thailand has significantly shaped the region’s political and socioeconomic landscape. Originally introduced to an economically marginalized, arid area, rubber cultivation gained momentum as Thailand transitioned from military-dominated rule to an electoral system in the late 1980s—a period marked by the rise of provincial business networks and increased civil society engagement in politics. With the Northeast holding a substantial portion of parliamentary seats, rubber plantations elevated the region’s political relevance within Thailand. This impact became particularly evident in the 2000s, when electoral politics reached its peak. Drawing on surveys, stakeholder interviews, and field research, this article examines the contested political power surrounding rubber plantation policies. Analyzing dynamics at the national, provincial, and community levels, the study illustrates how rubber policy frameworks were shaped by different political regimes, how political networks were mobilized through various channels, and how these forces influenced local communities engaged in rubber cultivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southeast Asian studies
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.14.1_17
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Frontier of Rubber Plantations in Northeastern Thailand

Viengrat Nethipo
Southeast Asian studies
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

The Political Frontier of Rubber Plantations in Northeastern Thailand

Viengrat Nethipo
article en

Abstract

The promotion of rubber plantations in Northeastern Thailand has significantly shaped the region’s political and socioeconomic landscape. Originally introduced to an economically marginalized, arid area, rubber cultivation gained momentum as Thailand transitioned from military-dominated rule to an electoral system in the late 1980s—a period marked by the rise of provincial business networks and increased civil society engagement in politics. With the Northeast holding a substantial portion of parliamentary seats, rubber plantations elevated the region’s political relevance within Thailand. This impact became particularly evident in the 2000s, when electoral politics reached its peak. Drawing on surveys, stakeholder interviews, and field research, this article examines the contested political power surrounding rubber plantation policies. Analyzing dynamics at the national, provincial, and community levels, the study illustrates how rubber policy frameworks were shaped by different political regimes, how political networks were mobilized through various channels, and how these forces influenced local communities engaged in rubber cultivation.

Southeast Asian studiesVol. 14(1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.