Null-Cycle Origins under Ontological Discipline: A Critical–Propositional Reading of A. Kaki's Model in Light of the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of A. Kaki’s Null-Cycle Origins (NCO): Deriving the Fundamental Acceleration Scale from a Zero-Energy Background in light of the foundational and recent bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study reconstructs the internal architecture of the NCO model—its treatment of singularity, net-zero energy, horizon topology, the white-hole interpretation of the observable universe, the derivation of the MOND acceleration scale, and the geometric reinterpretation of the dark sector—and then evaluates its philosophical and ontological scope under the modal discipline of the TO. Rather than dismissing the NCO framework, the article identifies both structural convergences and decisive ontological tensions. It argues that the model is highly sophisticated and heuristically fertile, especially in its treatment of boundary, informational continuity, and topological structure, but remains ontologically insufficient as an ultimate foundation when confronted with the modal necessity of the axioms of the Theory of Objectivity. The article further proposes an objectivist reinterpretation of the NCO, preserving its strongest insights as a derived cosmology rather than an ultimate ontology. In this reading, horizon structures are reinterpreted as phenomenic boundary elements, the topological strain tensor as residual relational memory, and the informational core of the model is reread in connection with the concept of knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, understood as functionally equivalent to atomic radiations. The central thesis of the paper is that the most fruitful relation between the NCO and the Theory of Objectivity is not one of exclusion, but of hermeneutical repositioning: the physical insights of the NCO may be retained, provided that they are subordinated to a deeper logical, ontological, and scientific framework. This work contributes to ongoing dialogue between contemporary cosmology, modal ontology, and foundational theories of intelligibility, while also reinforcing the role of the Theory of Objectivity as a critical framework for evaluating ambitious cosmological models. Keywords:Theory of Objectivity; Null-Cycle Origins; cosmology; modal ontology; zero-energy universe; horizon topology; white hole cosmology; dark matter; information; atomic radiations; phenomenology; ontological foundations