Watershed Protection as Dispossession in Japanese-Occupied Taiwan

Environmentalists have long seen in the watershed the promise of an ethic of stewardship predicated on the recognition that no action affecting a waterway can be free from upstream influences and downstream impacts. This article explores a context in which thinking in terms of watersheds acquired new scientific and political prominence: Taiwan under Japanese colonial rule (1895–1945). In the wake of destructive lowland floods, Japanese foresters blamed highland Indigenous peoples and their practices of shifting cultivation. This accusation reflected not just colonial condescension but also Japanese assumptions about watershed hydrology. Although contested within the colonial state, watershed protection became a common justification for violent dispossessions of Atayalic and Bunun communities. Large dam construction later intensified these dynamics by replacing river watersheds with sensitive reservoir watersheds. Interrogating the watershed reveals its political plasticity and shows the interplay between discourses of ecological interconnectedness and culpability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental History
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740094
Primary Topic
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watershed Protection as Dispossession in Japanese-Occupied Taiwan

John Kanbayashi
Environmental History
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
article

Watershed Protection as Dispossession in Japanese-Occupied Taiwan

John Kanbayashi
article en

Abstract

Environmentalists have long seen in the watershed the promise of an ethic of stewardship predicated on the recognition that no action affecting a waterway can be free from upstream influences and downstream impacts. This article explores a context in which thinking in terms of watersheds acquired new scientific and political prominence: Taiwan under Japanese colonial rule (1895–1945). In the wake of destructive lowland floods, Japanese foresters blamed highland Indigenous peoples and their practices of shifting cultivation. This accusation reflected not just colonial condescension but also Japanese assumptions about watershed hydrology. Although contested within the colonial state, watershed protection became a common justification for violent dispossessions of Atayalic and Bunun communities. Large dam construction later intensified these dynamics by replacing river watersheds with sensitive reservoir watersheds. Interrogating the watershed reveals its political plasticity and shows the interplay between discourses of ecological interconnectedness and culpability.

Environmental History
California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Watershed Protection as Dispossession in Japanese-Occupied Taiwan — John Kanbayashi · Environmental History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS