A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is frequently complicated by intestinal strictures, which substantially affect patients quality of life and long-term outcomes. Accurate classification of strictures-as inflammatory, fibrotic, or mixed-is critical for selecting optimal therapeutic strategies. In clinical practice, multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation is often employed to assess stricture characteristics. However, the accuracy and inter-specialty consistency of stricture evaluation within MDTs remain inadequately characterized. This study aimed to assess the intra-disciplinary consistency and accuracy of decision-making for CD-related strictures, evaluate the accuracy of post MDT decisions, and propose recommendations for stricture nature assessment and MDT workflow optimization. A mixed-methods study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital involving 42 patients with CD and intestinal strictures. MDT participants-including specialists from gastroenterology, surgery, ultrasound, and MDT meeting chairs-were involved in evaluating intra-disciplinary decision consistency and accuracy. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were also conducted to explore factors influencing clinical decision-making. Gastroenterologists demonstrated the highest intra-team consistency (PABAK = 0.75) and diagnostic accuracy (89.3%). Ultrasound specialists showed improved consistency following targeted training (from 0.46 to 0.93). The overall accuracy of historical MDT decisions was 92.9%. Key factors influencing stricture nature judgment included clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging features, and endoscopic evaluation. Seven core components were identified to improve MDT workflow: expert selection, team building, training, pre-meeting preparation, in-meeting procedures, post-meeting actions, and continuous quality improvement. This study reveals variability in decision-making for CD-related strictures across different specialties. To improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, we propose clear stricture classification criteria and a structured MDT workflow to standardize and enhance multidisciplinary management of CD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42386-2
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease

Xidong He, Huijun Shu, Qingli Zhu, Gechong Ruan et al.
Scientific Reports
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease

Xidong He, Huijun Shu, Qingli Zhu, Gechong Ruan, Lin Cong, Jing Qin, Hong Lv, Wenbo Li, Bei Tan, X Bai, Ji Li, Jiaming Qian, Hong Yang, Hui Xu, Li Wang, Xiyu Sun, Yue Li, Yinghao Sun
article en

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) is frequently complicated by intestinal strictures, which substantially affect patients quality of life and long-term outcomes. Accurate classification of strictures-as inflammatory, fibrotic, or mixed-is critical for selecting optimal therapeutic strategies. In clinical practice, multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation is often employed to assess stricture characteristics. However, the accuracy and inter-specialty consistency of stricture evaluation within MDTs remain inadequately characterized. This study aimed to assess the intra-disciplinary consistency and accuracy of decision-making for CD-related strictures, evaluate the accuracy of post MDT decisions, and propose recommendations for stricture nature assessment and MDT workflow optimization. A mixed-methods study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital involving 42 patients with CD and intestinal strictures. MDT participants-including specialists from gastroenterology, surgery, ultrasound, and MDT meeting chairs-were involved in evaluating intra-disciplinary decision consistency and accuracy. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were also conducted to explore factors influencing clinical decision-making. Gastroenterologists demonstrated the highest intra-team consistency (PABAK = 0.75) and diagnostic accuracy (89.3%). Ultrasound specialists showed improved consistency following targeted training (from 0.46 to 0.93). The overall accuracy of historical MDT decisions was 92.9%. Key factors influencing stricture nature judgment included clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging features, and endoscopic evaluation. Seven core components were identified to improve MDT workflow: expert selection, team building, training, pre-meeting preparation, in-meeting procedures, post-meeting actions, and continuous quality improvement. This study reveals variability in decision-making for CD-related strictures across different specialties. To improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, we propose clear stricture classification criteria and a structured MDT workflow to standardize and enhance multidisciplinary management of CD.

Scientific Reports
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.