Unveiling barriers and motivations to cycling across different stages of change

Despite its many benefits, cycling remains a relatively minor mode of transport in many North American cities. Hence, it is vital to investigate which perceived barriers prevent people from cycling and which aspects motivate them to cycle for transport. This study used a “stages of change” framework to identify individuals' cycling stages of change regarding their cycling behavior and future intention to cycle for transport. Then, the barriers and motivators for people at different stages were investigated. A survey of 1200 respondents was designed and administered in two Canadian cities. An interpretable ensemble learning approach, which combines multiple models to improve predictive performance, was used for modeling. The results suggest that traffic danger and the ease of getting around by other modes are the two main perceived barriers to cycling. Improving health and fitness, avoiding the hassle of parking cars, and helping to reduce carbon emissions were the top motivators for the population interested in cycling. Different barriers and motivators have different influences on people based on their cycling stage of change. For example, those not considering cycling (pre-decisional denial) do not mention traffic danger as a problem, but for those who want to cycle but feel that it is impossible (pre-decisional inhibition), traffic danger is the key problem preventing them. For the majority of those keen to start cycling (pre-actional), no problem is seen as preventing them. The results give nuance to problems and what prevents people, along with motivations, at the different stages of behavior change towards cycling. • This study investigates cycling barriers and motivators by cycling stages of change. • Distinct motivators and barriers are evident across the stages of change. • Improving health, fitness, and avoiding parking hassle are top cycling motivators. • Traffic danger and ease of other travel modes are the top barriers to cycling. • An interpretable ensemble learning approach is used for modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103572
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling barriers and motivations to cycling across different stages of change

Jérôme Laviolette, E. Owen D. Waygood, Kevin Manaugh, Hamed Naseri
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Unveiling barriers and motivations to cycling across different stages of change

Jérôme Laviolette, E. Owen D. Waygood, Kevin Manaugh, Hamed Naseri
article en

Abstract

Despite its many benefits, cycling remains a relatively minor mode of transport in many North American cities. Hence, it is vital to investigate which perceived barriers prevent people from cycling and which aspects motivate them to cycle for transport. This study used a “stages of change” framework to identify individuals' cycling stages of change regarding their cycling behavior and future intention to cycle for transport. Then, the barriers and motivators for people at different stages were investigated. A survey of 1200 respondents was designed and administered in two Canadian cities. An interpretable ensemble learning approach, which combines multiple models to improve predictive performance, was used for modeling. The results suggest that traffic danger and the ease of getting around by other modes are the two main perceived barriers to cycling. Improving health and fitness, avoiding the hassle of parking cars, and helping to reduce carbon emissions were the top motivators for the population interested in cycling. Different barriers and motivators have different influences on people based on their cycling stage of change. For example, those not considering cycling (pre-decisional denial) do not mention traffic danger as a problem, but for those who want to cycle but feel that it is impossible (pre-decisional inhibition), traffic danger is the key problem preventing them. For the majority of those keen to start cycling (pre-actional), no problem is seen as preventing them. The results give nuance to problems and what prevents people, along with motivations, at the different stages of behavior change towards cycling. • This study investigates cycling barriers and motivators by cycling stages of change. • Distinct motivators and barriers are evident across the stages of change. • Improving health, fitness, and avoiding parking hassle are top cycling motivators. • Traffic danger and ease of other travel modes are the top barriers to cycling. • An interpretable ensemble learning approach is used for modeling.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 119
Polytechnique Montréal (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.