Gray zone conflicts in cyberspace: challenges for security and defense governance

This paper examines the complexities of cyberspace security governance. By using illustrative examples from the United States, the article explores how uncertainty, challenges in attribution, and the multiplicity of actors in cyberspace, when interacting with overlapping responsibilities among security and defense agencies, may create conditions associated with gray security governance, in which institutional and operational boundaries become less clearly defined. It is also argued that the current ambiguous form of cyber governance has allowed states to pursue strategic objectives in cyberspace without crossing the threshold of traditional conflict, which might enhance the difficulty in identifying and responding to cyber threats. Examples throughout the analysis will elucidate these challenges, highlighting that such governance dilemmas are globally present. The paper concludes with potential recommendations for a research and policy agenda to address the complexity of gray governance in cyberspace and how to overcome it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1770003
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gray zone conflicts in cyberspace: challenges for security and defense governance

Luiz Rogério Franco Goldoni, Henrique Ribeiro da Rocha
Frontiers in Political Science
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Gray zone conflicts in cyberspace: challenges for security and defense governance

Luiz Rogério Franco Goldoni, Henrique Ribeiro da Rocha
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the complexities of cyberspace security governance. By using illustrative examples from the United States, the article explores how uncertainty, challenges in attribution, and the multiplicity of actors in cyberspace, when interacting with overlapping responsibilities among security and defense agencies, may create conditions associated with gray security governance, in which institutional and operational boundaries become less clearly defined. It is also argued that the current ambiguous form of cyber governance has allowed states to pursue strategic objectives in cyberspace without crossing the threshold of traditional conflict, which might enhance the difficulty in identifying and responding to cyber threats. Examples throughout the analysis will elucidate these challenges, highlighting that such governance dilemmas are globally present. The paper concludes with potential recommendations for a research and policy agenda to address the complexity of gray governance in cyberspace and how to overcome it.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
Escola de Comando e Estado-Maior do Exército (BR)
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.