Preferences of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals on First‐Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Pregnant women and healthcare professionals support FTAS availability. Optimization should focus on maximizing sensitivity and minimizing false positive rates, whereas gestational age at diagnosis and the range of anomalies detected are considered less important in influencing preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70115
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals on First‐Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Esther Sikkel, Kim Bronsgeest, L Henneman, M. Bekker et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Preferences of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals on First‐Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Esther Sikkel, Kim Bronsgeest, L Henneman, M. Bekker, Neeltje M. T. H. Crombag, Monique C. Haak, Eline E. R. Lust, Professor Caterina M (Katia) Bilardo, Ian Smith, Robert-Jan H Galjaard
article en

Abstract

Pregnant women and healthcare professionals support FTAS availability. Optimization should focus on maximizing sensitivity and minimizing false positive rates, whereas gestational age at diagnosis and the range of anomalies detected are considered less important in influencing preferences.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), National Institute of Public Health (GW), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preferences of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals on First‐Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies: A Discrete Choice Experiment — Esther Sikkel, Kim Bronsgeest, et al. · Prenatal Diagnosis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS