Predicting 30-Day Readmission Risks in Breast Cancer Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach

Hospital readmission within 30 days remains a significant challenge in oncology practice, contributing to higher healthcare costs, treatment delays, and poorer patient outcomes. Existing predictive models for breast cancer readmission are often limited by inadequate interpretability and generalisability. This study develops and evaluates an explainable machine learning (ML) framework to predict 30-day hospital readmissions among breast cancer patients, with specific emphasis on methodological transparency and avoidance of information leakage. A retrospective dataset including demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables such as age, comorbidity burden, ECOG performance status, baseline neutrophil count, and dosage adjustments was analysed. Multiple ML classifiers were evaluated—including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbours, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost—using repeated stratified cross-validation (5 × 10 folds). Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE applied strictly within the training folds to prevent data leakage. Out-of-fold performance metrics included ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, calibration curves, and Brier scores. Random Forest demonstrated the strongest discrimination specificity of 0.57 ± 0.33, the highest among all models, and a superior ROC-AUC of 0.68 ± 0.17, which was appropriate for the small, imbalanced dataset. For interpretability, each model was refit on the full dataset and analysed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), and LIME. Comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status consistently emerged as the most influential predictors across all explainability techniques, aligning with established clinical evidence. The findings highlight the feasibility of applying explainable ML methods to small, imbalanced oncology datasets and demonstrate their potential to support early clinical risk identification in breast cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052467
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting 30-Day Readmission Risks in Breast Cancer Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach

Tebogo Makaba, Mlondolozi Mqadi, Elliot Mbunge
Applied Sciences
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Predicting 30-Day Readmission Risks in Breast Cancer Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach

Tebogo Makaba, Mlondolozi Mqadi, Elliot Mbunge
article en

Abstract

Hospital readmission within 30 days remains a significant challenge in oncology practice, contributing to higher healthcare costs, treatment delays, and poorer patient outcomes. Existing predictive models for breast cancer readmission are often limited by inadequate interpretability and generalisability. This study develops and evaluates an explainable machine learning (ML) framework to predict 30-day hospital readmissions among breast cancer patients, with specific emphasis on methodological transparency and avoidance of information leakage. A retrospective dataset including demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables such as age, comorbidity burden, ECOG performance status, baseline neutrophil count, and dosage adjustments was analysed. Multiple ML classifiers were evaluated—including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbours, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost—using repeated stratified cross-validation (5 × 10 folds). Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE applied strictly within the training folds to prevent data leakage. Out-of-fold performance metrics included ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, calibration curves, and Brier scores. Random Forest demonstrated the strongest discrimination specificity of 0.57 ± 0.33, the highest among all models, and a superior ROC-AUC of 0.68 ± 0.17, which was appropriate for the small, imbalanced dataset. For interpretability, each model was refit on the full dataset and analysed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), and LIME. Comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status consistently emerged as the most influential predictors across all explainability techniques, aligning with established clinical evidence. The findings highlight the feasibility of applying explainable ML methods to small, imbalanced oncology datasets and demonstrate their potential to support early clinical risk identification in breast cancer care.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(5)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
University of Johannesburg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.