Brain state dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves motor learning outcomes

<i>Objective.</i>Motor learning is key to successful neuro-rehabilitation. Combinations of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been proposed for neurorehabilitation following conditions such as stroke. However, rTMS is typically delivered via a fixed protocol without taking into consideration the current brain states of participants. We propose a new BCI-based rTMS delivery protocol for supporting motor learning. Specifically, we propose BCI-based brain state dependent delivery of rTMS, in which a BCI system measures the event-related desynchronisation (ERD; a neural marker of motor learning in the alpha band, selected because it is a robust, well-established real-time EEG correlate of motor activity and cortical excitability) in order to determine when to deliver rTMS.<i>Approach.</i>We compare our proposed rTMS delivery protocol with two state of the art comparable protocols: delivery of rTMS prior to the BCI-based motor learning and delivery of rTMS at fixed times throughout the experiment, as well as a control condition in which no rTMS was used. Each protocol is tested with a different group (<i>n</i> = 8) of participants (<i>n</i> = 32 total participants).<i>Main results</i>. Our results reveal a significant effect of changing the rTMS delivery protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and that our proposed rTMS delivery protocol delivers better motor learning outcomes than other state of the art rTMS delivery protocols (e.g. BCI group vs fixed times group:<i>p</i> = 0.003, BCI group vs no rTMS group:<i>p</i> = 0.03). Inspection of ERD dynamics from each of our participant groups demonstrates that our BCI-based rTMS paradigm keeps corticospinal excitability relatively stable throughout the learning period, keeping the brain in a more optimal learning state for longer.<i>Significance</i>. These findings suggest potential applications for adaptive rTMS-BCI systems in clinical neurorehabilitation, sports skill learning, and neuroprosthetic control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ae4dbe
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain state dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves motor learning outcomes

Jamie Tallent, Tony Barbera, Roshan Withanage, Joao Oliveira et al.
Journal of Neural Engineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Brain state dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves motor learning outcomes

Jamie Tallent, Tony Barbera, Roshan Withanage, Joao Oliveira, Ian Daly
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Motor learning is key to successful neuro-rehabilitation. Combinations of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been proposed for neurorehabilitation following conditions such as stroke. However, rTMS is typically delivered via a fixed protocol without taking into consideration the current brain states of participants. We propose a new BCI-based rTMS delivery protocol for supporting motor learning. Specifically, we propose BCI-based brain state dependent delivery of rTMS, in which a BCI system measures the event-related desynchronisation (ERD; a neural marker of motor learning in the alpha band, selected because it is a robust, well-established real-time EEG correlate of motor activity and cortical excitability) in order to determine when to deliver rTMS.<i>Approach.</i>We compare our proposed rTMS delivery protocol with two state of the art comparable protocols: delivery of rTMS prior to the BCI-based motor learning and delivery of rTMS at fixed times throughout the experiment, as well as a control condition in which no rTMS was used. Each protocol is tested with a different group (<i>n</i> = 8) of participants (<i>n</i> = 32 total participants).<i>Main results</i>. Our results reveal a significant effect of changing the rTMS delivery protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and that our proposed rTMS delivery protocol delivers better motor learning outcomes than other state of the art rTMS delivery protocols (e.g. BCI group vs fixed times group:<i>p</i> = 0.003, BCI group vs no rTMS group:<i>p</i> = 0.03). Inspection of ERD dynamics from each of our participant groups demonstrates that our BCI-based rTMS paradigm keeps corticospinal excitability relatively stable throughout the learning period, keeping the brain in a more optimal learning state for longer.<i>Significance</i>. These findings suggest potential applications for adaptive rTMS-BCI systems in clinical neurorehabilitation, sports skill learning, and neuroprosthetic control.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 23(2)
University of Essex (GB), University of Lisbon (PT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.