Pozitivistická metoda dějin umění a její nepřátelé. Alfred Woltmann v diskusi

This contribution presents discussions among experts in the 1860s and 1870s, focusing on those in which Alfred Woltmann (1841–1880), the first full professor of the history of art at the Prague university, had participated. Woltmann came to be known especially for his criticism of forged glosses in medieval manuscripts which featured Slavic names and were thus supposed to attest to the Bohemian origin of those works. Nevertheless, he also participated in other controversies related to the originality of Czech fine arts, interpretation of the work of Hans Holbein the Younger, and the like. These discussions took the form of fights over who is competent to judge the subject: historians of art, artists, or amateur experts. Other debates focused on scientific methods which were coming into conflict with literary writing about arts (as represented by, e.g., the well-known art historian Hermann Grimm). The author highlights the often oversimplified interpretation of these debates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC HISTORIA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE PRAGENSIS
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23365730.2026.16
Primary Topic
Central European national history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pozitivistická metoda dějin umění a její nepřátelé. Alfred Woltmann v diskusi

Jindřich Vybíral
AUC HISTORIA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE PRAGENSIS
Central European national history
article

Pozitivistická metoda dějin umění a její nepřátelé. Alfred Woltmann v diskusi

Jindřich Vybíral
article en

Abstract

This contribution presents discussions among experts in the 1860s and 1870s, focusing on those in which Alfred Woltmann (1841–1880), the first full professor of the history of art at the Prague university, had participated. Woltmann came to be known especially for his criticism of forged glosses in medieval manuscripts which featured Slavic names and were thus supposed to attest to the Bohemian origin of those works. Nevertheless, he also participated in other controversies related to the originality of Czech fine arts, interpretation of the work of Hans Holbein the Younger, and the like. These discussions took the form of fights over who is competent to judge the subject: historians of art, artists, or amateur experts. Other debates focused on scientific methods which were coming into conflict with literary writing about arts (as represented by, e.g., the well-known art historian Hermann Grimm). The author highlights the often oversimplified interpretation of these debates.

AUC HISTORIA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE PRAGENSISVol. 66(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Central European national history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.