How Do Children Think About Death? A Narrative Review of Historical and Recent Developmental Perspectives Examining Children’s Understanding of Death

BackgroundResearch has emphasized the importance of helping children develop understandings of death that are conceptually healthy accurate and emotionally supportive. Yet, open conversations about death remain stigmatized, particularly with children. Nonetheless, children express curiosity and a desire to discuss and understand death. Adults, however, report having feelings of discomfort and being too unqualified to facilitate these dialogues. Because adults may believe these discussions are unnecessary, there is a need to clarify the depth of children's knowledge of death.Study AimsThis review sought to clarify what children understand about death and how they come to learn about it.ResultsFindings suggest that children develop an understanding of death through several key components across childhood. There are three core dimensions widely agreed upon in the literature: (1) biological cessation, (2) irreversibility, and (3) universality. There are also additional components that remain more actively explored and less consistently established. These include (4) applicability, (5) personal mortality, (6) causality, and (7) noncorporeal continuation. This knowledge may be acquired naturally through cognitive development and can also be shaped by direct exposure (e.g., the death of a loved one or pet) and/or indirect experiences (e.g., media depictions). When learned indirectly and without guidance, there is an increased risk of children formulating inaccurate or distressing attitudes toward death.ImplicationsBuilding on these insights, we offer developmentally adapted approaches for supporting children's understanding of death within pedagogical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045261430553
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Children Think About Death? A Narrative Review of Historical and Recent Developmental Perspectives Examining Children’s Understanding of Death

Jonathan Ashley Smith, Nathalie Maltais, A. Mendrek, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy et al.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

How Do Children Think About Death? A Narrative Review of Historical and Recent Developmental Perspectives Examining Children’s Understanding of Death

Jonathan Ashley Smith, Nathalie Maltais, A. Mendrek, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy, Catherine Malboeuf‐Hurtubise, David Lefrançois, Marc-André Éthier, Zachary Fry, Terra Léger-Goodes, Lia Gieg
article en

Abstract

BackgroundResearch has emphasized the importance of helping children develop understandings of death that are conceptually healthy accurate and emotionally supportive. Yet, open conversations about death remain stigmatized, particularly with children. Nonetheless, children express curiosity and a desire to discuss and understand death. Adults, however, report having feelings of discomfort and being too unqualified to facilitate these dialogues. Because adults may believe these discussions are unnecessary, there is a need to clarify the depth of children's knowledge of death.Study AimsThis review sought to clarify what children understand about death and how they come to learn about it.ResultsFindings suggest that children develop an understanding of death through several key components across childhood. There are three core dimensions widely agreed upon in the literature: (1) biological cessation, (2) irreversibility, and (3) universality. There are also additional components that remain more actively explored and less consistently established. These include (4) applicability, (5) personal mortality, (6) causality, and (7) noncorporeal continuation. This knowledge may be acquired naturally through cognitive development and can also be shaped by direct exposure (e.g., the death of a loved one or pet) and/or indirect experiences (e.g., media depictions). When learned indirectly and without guidance, there is an increased risk of children formulating inaccurate or distressing attitudes toward death.ImplicationsBuilding on these insights, we offer developmentally adapted approaches for supporting children's understanding of death within pedagogical settings.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Bishop's University (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), University of Wollongong (AU), Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), Université Laval (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.