French Validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS): Psychometric Properties Across Digital and Paper Formats

Anhedonia, the diminished ability to experience pleasure, is a transdiagnostic symptom in several neuropsychiatric disorders. To comprehensively assess this symptom, the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) measures interest, motivation, effort, and consummatory pleasure across four reward types. Aim: Using three independent samples, we aimed to validate the French version of the DARS and evaluate its psychometric properties across digital (Samples 1 and 2) and paper-based (Sample 3) formats. Methods: A total of 1,437 French-speaking participants from the general population completed the DARS alongside measures of anhedonia, depression, and behavioral inhibition/activation. Results: Factor analyses confirmed the four-factor structure of the DARS with excellent model fit indices (CFI≥.962, RMSEA≤.036) and strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.74–0.93) across both formats. The French DARS showed good convergent validity, with weak-to-moderate correlations with other anhedonia and behavioral activation measures, and strong divergent validity, with weak correlations with depression. Gender differences were found; women scored higher overall, while men scored higher on the hobbies subscale. Measurement invariance analyses supported configural and metric invariance across formats, though full invariance was not achieved due to a lack of scalar invariance. Discussion/Conclusion: These findings support the French DARS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing anhedonia. This repository contains the French version of the instrument validated in this study. The original English version can be accessed in the Appendix of the following article: Rizvi, S. J., Quilty, L. C., Sproule, B. A., Cyriac, A., Michael Bagby, R., & Kennedy, S. H. (2015). Development and validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) in a community sample and individuals with major depression. Psychiatry research, 229(1-2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.062 The materials in this project include several comparison instruments whose original versions are protected by copyright and therefore cannot be made publicly available in this repository. These instruments are the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression Scale (CES-D). Access to these instruments is restricted to licensed or authorized users. They can be obtained through the original publishers, academic libraries, or by contacting the copyright holders directly. Researchers affiliated with academic institutions may also obtain access through their institutional subscriptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ORBi UMONS
Published
2025-01-15
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

French Validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS): Psychometric Properties Across Digital and Paper Formats

Federico Cassioli, Nellia Bellaert, Mandy Rossignol, Léa Henriette
ORBi UMONS
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

French Validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS): Psychometric Properties Across Digital and Paper Formats

Federico Cassioli, Nellia Bellaert, Mandy Rossignol, Léa Henriette
article en

Abstract

Anhedonia, the diminished ability to experience pleasure, is a transdiagnostic symptom in several neuropsychiatric disorders. To comprehensively assess this symptom, the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) measures interest, motivation, effort, and consummatory pleasure across four reward types. Aim: Using three independent samples, we aimed to validate the French version of the DARS and evaluate its psychometric properties across digital (Samples 1 and 2) and paper-based (Sample 3) formats. Methods: A total of 1,437 French-speaking participants from the general population completed the DARS alongside measures of anhedonia, depression, and behavioral inhibition/activation. Results: Factor analyses confirmed the four-factor structure of the DARS with excellent model fit indices (CFI≥.962, RMSEA≤.036) and strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.74–0.93) across both formats. The French DARS showed good convergent validity, with weak-to-moderate correlations with other anhedonia and behavioral activation measures, and strong divergent validity, with weak correlations with depression. Gender differences were found; women scored higher overall, while men scored higher on the hobbies subscale. Measurement invariance analyses supported configural and metric invariance across formats, though full invariance was not achieved due to a lack of scalar invariance. Discussion/Conclusion: These findings support the French DARS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing anhedonia. This repository contains the French version of the instrument validated in this study. The original English version can be accessed in the Appendix of the following article: Rizvi, S. J., Quilty, L. C., Sproule, B. A., Cyriac, A., Michael Bagby, R., & Kennedy, S. H. (2015). Development and validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) in a community sample and individuals with major depression. Psychiatry research, 229(1-2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.062 The materials in this project include several comparison instruments whose original versions are protected by copyright and therefore cannot be made publicly available in this repository. These instruments are the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression Scale (CES-D). Access to these instruments is restricted to licensed or authorized users. They can be obtained through the original publishers, academic libraries, or by contacting the copyright holders directly. Researchers affiliated with academic institutions may also obtain access through their institutional subscriptions.

ORBi UMONS
University of Mons (BE), Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.