Effects of farming management at the landscape scale on pollinators and natural enemies and associated crop pests. A review.

Farming management and alterations in land cover play crucial roles in driving changes in biodiversity, altering ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Whereas land cover corresponds to the identity of cultivated/non-cultivated ecosystems in the landscape, farming management describes all the components of farming activities within crops and grassland (i.e., farming practices, crop successions, and farming systems). Despite extensive research on the relationship between land cover and arthropod biodiversity at the landscape scale, there is a surprising scarcity of studies examining the impacts of farming management on arthropods at the same scale. This is unexpected given the already recognized field-scale impact on arthropods and related ecosystem services (such as pollination and biological control), and the fact that most species move or supplement their resources in multiple patches across agricultural landscapes. We conducted a comprehensive literature review that aimed at answering two fundamental questions: 1) What components of farming management are considered at the landscape scale? 2) Does farming management at the landscape scale impact arthropod biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions and services? We performed a query on the Web of Science, on original studies published from January 2005 to December 2021 and addressing the broad notion of farming management at the landscape scale on arthropods. The key findings are as follows: 1) The effect of farming management components at the landscape scale on arthropods was tackled in only 30 studies that highlighted that its response was highly taxon dependent. We have reported positive effects of organic farming on pollinators, as well as positive effects of extensification of farming practices on natural enemies and biocontrol. 2) Most studies focused on the effect of organic farming on natural enemies and associated pests, and reported contrasting effects on these taxa. Our study underscores the challenges in quantifying farming management at the landscape scale, and yet its importance in comprehending the dynamics of biodiversity and related ecosystem services. We discuss research perspectives for an improved consideration of farming management on a landscape scale, particularly on arthropods, to attenuate insect decline as well as ecosystem service loss in agroecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ORBi UMONS
Published
2024-08-30
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of farming management at the landscape scale on pollinators and natural enemies and associated crop pests. A review.

Théo Brusse, Ronan Marrec, Gaël Caro, Laura Henckel et al.
ORBi UMONS
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Effects of farming management at the landscape scale on pollinators and natural enemies and associated crop pests. A review.

Théo Brusse, Ronan Marrec, Gaël Caro, Laura Henckel, Aude Barbottin, Kévin Tougeron
article en

Abstract

Farming management and alterations in land cover play crucial roles in driving changes in biodiversity, altering ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Whereas land cover corresponds to the identity of cultivated/non-cultivated ecosystems in the landscape, farming management describes all the components of farming activities within crops and grassland (i.e., farming practices, crop successions, and farming systems). Despite extensive research on the relationship between land cover and arthropod biodiversity at the landscape scale, there is a surprising scarcity of studies examining the impacts of farming management on arthropods at the same scale. This is unexpected given the already recognized field-scale impact on arthropods and related ecosystem services (such as pollination and biological control), and the fact that most species move or supplement their resources in multiple patches across agricultural landscapes. We conducted a comprehensive literature review that aimed at answering two fundamental questions: 1) What components of farming management are considered at the landscape scale? 2) Does farming management at the landscape scale impact arthropod biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions and services? We performed a query on the Web of Science, on original studies published from January 2005 to December 2021 and addressing the broad notion of farming management at the landscape scale on arthropods. The key findings are as follows: 1) The effect of farming management components at the landscape scale on arthropods was tackled in only 30 studies that highlighted that its response was highly taxon dependent. We have reported positive effects of organic farming on pollinators, as well as positive effects of extensification of farming practices on natural enemies and biocontrol. 2) Most studies focused on the effect of organic farming on natural enemies and associated pests, and reported contrasting effects on these taxa. Our study underscores the challenges in quantifying farming management at the landscape scale, and yet its importance in comprehending the dynamics of biodiversity and related ecosystem services. We discuss research perspectives for an improved consideration of farming management on a landscape scale, particularly on arthropods, to attenuate insect decline as well as ecosystem service loss in agroecosystems.

ORBi UMONS
University of Mons (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.