Arsenic Removal Technologies: A Critical Review of Environmental Impacts, Economic Viability, and Scale-Up Challenges

Arsenic-contaminated groundwater requires efficient, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable removal technologies. This review critically evaluates conventional treatment methods, including chemical coagulation/precipitation, adsorption, ion exchange, electrocoagulation (EC), and membrane filtration, alongside emerging approaches such as photocatalysis, magnetic nanomaterials, ozonation, bioremediation, and membrane distillation. A quantitative benchmarking of reported studies shows that membrane filtration, EC, and adsorption typically achieve 85–99% arsenic removal under optimized conditions, with energy consumption generally ranging from 0.2 to 4 kWh m–3, depending on process configuration. However, large-scale implementation is constrained by sludge and brine management, membrane fouling, electrode passivation, chemical demand, and associated operational costs. Emerging technologies demonstrate comparable removal efficiencies in laboratory-scale studies but face uncertainties regarding process stability, reaction kinetics, long-term performance, and techno-economic feasibility. Moreover, hybrid treatment systems have the potential to overcome the limitations of standalone processes, improve removal efficiency, and reduce environmental impacts, but require further lifecycle and cost assessments. By integrating performance metrics with environmental and economic trade-offs, this review identifies key scale-up challenges and outlines research priorities for sustainable arsenic mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.6c00027
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arsenic Removal Technologies: A Critical Review of Environmental Impacts, Economic Viability, and Scale-Up Challenges

Mihir Kumar Purkait, Mukesh Bharti, Pranjal P. Das
ACS ES&T Water
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
article

Arsenic Removal Technologies: A Critical Review of Environmental Impacts, Economic Viability, and Scale-Up Challenges

Mihir Kumar Purkait, Mukesh Bharti, Pranjal P. Das
article en

Abstract

Arsenic-contaminated groundwater requires efficient, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable removal technologies. This review critically evaluates conventional treatment methods, including chemical coagulation/precipitation, adsorption, ion exchange, electrocoagulation (EC), and membrane filtration, alongside emerging approaches such as photocatalysis, magnetic nanomaterials, ozonation, bioremediation, and membrane distillation. A quantitative benchmarking of reported studies shows that membrane filtration, EC, and adsorption typically achieve 85–99% arsenic removal under optimized conditions, with energy consumption generally ranging from 0.2 to 4 kWh m–3, depending on process configuration. However, large-scale implementation is constrained by sludge and brine management, membrane fouling, electrode passivation, chemical demand, and associated operational costs. Emerging technologies demonstrate comparable removal efficiencies in laboratory-scale studies but face uncertainties regarding process stability, reaction kinetics, long-term performance, and techno-economic feasibility. Moreover, hybrid treatment systems have the potential to overcome the limitations of standalone processes, improve removal efficiency, and reduce environmental impacts, but require further lifecycle and cost assessments. By integrating performance metrics with environmental and economic trade-offs, this review identifies key scale-up challenges and outlines research priorities for sustainable arsenic mitigation.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 6(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.