Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system

The conservation agriculture (CA)-based approaches, including zero tillage (ZT)/reduced tillage (RT) with pulse-based cropping systems, support climate resilience in the long-run. However, the support services of CA are increasingly evident under irrigated agro-ecologies with normal/flood irrigation. Necessarily, the benefits of CA and pulse-based cropping intensification must be explored in under sprinkler irrigation system because of anticipated water scarcity across the globe. We aimed to compare the conservation tillage x sprinkler irrigation scheduling with conventional tillage (CT) and flood irrigation in a maize (Zea mays L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping system for two years. The study was undertaken in split-plot design with three tillage systems in main plots: ZT, reduced tillage (RT), and CT in both crops and six irrigation management subplots such as sprinkler irrigation and normal/flood irrigation scheduling at branching, pod formation, and branching + pod formation stages of field pea. Tillage practices followed an order of ZT > RT > CT (p < 0.05) for productivity of both crops. The ZT with sprinkler irrigation at branching + pod formation stages significantly increased field pea yield by 70% (CI 95%) and maize yield by 33.1% (CI 95%) compared with CT and flood irrigation (conventional practice). Consequently, ZT with sprinkler irrigation resulted in 18.8% and 6.7% (CI 95%) higher system productivity compared with CT and flood irrigation (p < 0.05). The ZT resulted in an additional net benefit of INR 45,912 compared with CT. Besides, sprinkler-irrigation provided an additional benefit of INR 13,903 compared with flood irrigation. The reduction in tillage intensity (ZT and RT) significantly increased water-use-efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) compared to CT. Notably, ZT with sprinkler irrigation reduced the consumptive use of water compared to conventional practice. In a system perspective, ZT with sprinkler irrigation (at branch and pod formation) increased 59.2% WUE and 75.6% WP than conventional practice. Thus, in arid and semi-arid regions, where water resources are scarce, conservation tillage with micro-irrigation can be adopted in pulse-based cropping system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39809-5
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system

Rajiv Kumar Singh, Man Mohan Deo, Asik Dutta, Mohammad Hashim et al.
Scientific Reports
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system

Rajiv Kumar Singh, Man Mohan Deo, Asik Dutta, Mohammad Hashim, N. (Nishant) Kumar, Rajan Prakash Shakya, Subhash Babu, K. K. Hazra, Sunil Kumar, Mukesh Kumar, Mohammad Hasanain, C. P. Nath, D. K. Srivastava, C. S. Praharaj, G. P. Dixit
article en

Abstract

The conservation agriculture (CA)-based approaches, including zero tillage (ZT)/reduced tillage (RT) with pulse-based cropping systems, support climate resilience in the long-run. However, the support services of CA are increasingly evident under irrigated agro-ecologies with normal/flood irrigation. Necessarily, the benefits of CA and pulse-based cropping intensification must be explored in under sprinkler irrigation system because of anticipated water scarcity across the globe. We aimed to compare the conservation tillage x sprinkler irrigation scheduling with conventional tillage (CT) and flood irrigation in a maize (Zea mays L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping system for two years. The study was undertaken in split-plot design with three tillage systems in main plots: ZT, reduced tillage (RT), and CT in both crops and six irrigation management subplots such as sprinkler irrigation and normal/flood irrigation scheduling at branching, pod formation, and branching + pod formation stages of field pea. Tillage practices followed an order of ZT > RT > CT (p < 0.05) for productivity of both crops. The ZT with sprinkler irrigation at branching + pod formation stages significantly increased field pea yield by 70% (CI 95%) and maize yield by 33.1% (CI 95%) compared with CT and flood irrigation (conventional practice). Consequently, ZT with sprinkler irrigation resulted in 18.8% and 6.7% (CI 95%) higher system productivity compared with CT and flood irrigation (p < 0.05). The ZT resulted in an additional net benefit of INR 45,912 compared with CT. Besides, sprinkler-irrigation provided an additional benefit of INR 13,903 compared with flood irrigation. The reduction in tillage intensity (ZT and RT) significantly increased water-use-efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) compared to CT. Notably, ZT with sprinkler irrigation reduced the consumptive use of water compared to conventional practice. In a system perspective, ZT with sprinkler irrigation (at branch and pod formation) increased 59.2% WUE and 75.6% WP than conventional practice. Thus, in arid and semi-arid regions, where water resources are scarce, conservation tillage with micro-irrigation can be adopted in pulse-based cropping system.

Scientific Reports
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IN), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IN), Directorate of Groundnut Research (IN), Madhya Pradesh Council of Science and Technology (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.