Decolonizing Democratic Theory: A Democratic Case for Unelected Indigenous Governments

Abstract Many Indigenous nations in the settler state of Canada have two governments: elective band councils and a customary leadership not subject to regular elections. When these groups struggle for authority, outsiders often side with the band councils on the assumption that elections are necessary for a government to be democratic. But this assumption reflects an unwarranted electoral bias. In fact, non-elective customary governments can be more democratic than elected band councils. As we show, customary governments sometimes draw wider participation from Indigenous communities, and they can create responsiveness through non-electoral mechanisms that promote voice and exit. This gives Canada a democratic reason to promote Indigenous democratic innovation through policy and legal reforms that facilitate state recognition of customary governments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423925100978
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonizing Democratic Theory: A Democratic Case for Unelected Indigenous Governments

Daniel Sherwin, Daniel Hutton Ferris
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Decolonizing Democratic Theory: A Democratic Case for Unelected Indigenous Governments

Daniel Sherwin, Daniel Hutton Ferris
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many Indigenous nations in the settler state of Canada have two governments: elective band councils and a customary leadership not subject to regular elections. When these groups struggle for authority, outsiders often side with the band councils on the assumption that elections are necessary for a government to be democratic. But this assumption reflects an unwarranted electoral bias. In fact, non-elective customary governments can be more democratic than elected band councils. As we show, customary governments sometimes draw wider participation from Indigenous communities, and they can create responsiveness through non-electoral mechanisms that promote voice and exit. This gives Canada a democratic reason to promote Indigenous democratic innovation through policy and legal reforms that facilitate state recognition of customary governments.

Canadian Journal of Political Science
Newcastle University (GB), Mount Royal University (CA)
McGill University, Mount Royal University, University of Toronto, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decolonizing Democratic Theory: A Democratic Case for Unelected Indigenous Governments — Daniel Sherwin, Daniel Hutton Ferris · Canadian Journal of Political Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS