Decolonizing Democratic Theory: A Democratic Case for Unelected Indigenous Governments
Abstract Many Indigenous nations in the settler state of Canada have two governments: elective band councils and a customary leadership not subject to regular elections. When these groups struggle for authority, outsiders often side with the band councils on the assumption that elections are necessary for a government to be democratic. But this assumption reflects an unwarranted electoral bias. In fact, non-elective customary governments can be more democratic than elected band councils. As we show, customary governments sometimes draw wider participation from Indigenous communities, and they can create responsiveness through non-electoral mechanisms that promote voice and exit. This gives Canada a democratic reason to promote Indigenous democratic innovation through policy and legal reforms that facilitate state recognition of customary governments.
Authors
- Daniel Sherwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-2081)
- Daniel Hutton Ferris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-1563)
Institutions
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Mount Royal University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Canadian Journal of Political Science
- Published
- 2026-03-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423925100978
- Primary Topic
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- McGill University
- Mount Royal University
- University of Toronto
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada