Real-world effectiveness of 2-weekly (Q2W) versus 4-weekly (Q4W) nivolumab for treatment of adjuvant and advanced melanoma at BC Cancer

IntroductionNivolumab has demonstrated promising survival outcomes in melanoma. Original dosing was 3 mg/kg (maximum 240 mg) intravenously (IV) every two weeks (Q2 W). Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies demonstrating similar efficacy, 6 mg/kg (maximum 480 mg) IV every four weeks (Q4 W) dosing was introduced. However, real-world effectiveness data remains limited. This study analyzed real-world effectiveness between Q2 W versus Q4 W nivolumab dosing intervals in adjuvant and metastatic melanoma patients.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted to compare overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), prescribing trends, and reasons for switching intervals between Q2 W versus Q4 W nivolumab dosing in advanced and adjuvant melanoma patients. Patients started nivolumab between January 1st, 2019, to December 31st, 2020, and were followed up until July 31st, 2024. Patients were stratified based on the treatment intent.ResultsSeventy patients (advanced n = 27, adjuvant n = 43) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the dosing groups for each treatment intent. In the advanced group, the median time of PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI 0.0 to 48.9 months) for Q2 W group versus 11.7 months (95% CI 0.0 to 33.7 months) for the Q4 W group. The median time of OS was 32.0 months (95% CI 0.0 to 107.2 months) for the Q2 W group compared to 25.2 months (95% CI 0 to 66.7 months) for the Q4 W group. Meanwhile, in the adjuvant group, OS and PFS outcomes were not reached at follow-up: 14/20 (70.0%) and 13/23 (56.5%) patients have not progressed in the Q2 W and Q4 W groups respectively. There were 16/20 (80.0%) and 17/23 (73.9%) who were still alive at the end of follow up in the Q2 W and Q4 W groups, respectively.ConclusionsIn advanced melanoma patients, Q4 W dosing showed comparable effectiveness with Q2 W dosing. Based on these results and previous real-world evidence demonstrating similar safety profiles, Q4 W dosing provides an alternative dosing interval that may lead to decreased healthcare utilization and exposure, while supporting environmental initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261425252
Primary Topic
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world effectiveness of 2-weekly (Q2W) versus 4-weekly (Q4W) nivolumab for treatment of adjuvant and advanced melanoma at BC Cancer

Victoria Kletas, Lynne Nakashima, Jennifer Truong, Kimberly Schaff et al.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
article

Real-world effectiveness of 2-weekly (Q2W) versus 4-weekly (Q4W) nivolumab for treatment of adjuvant and advanced melanoma at BC Cancer

Victoria Kletas, Lynne Nakashima, Jennifer Truong, Kimberly Schaff, Ruishen Yu, Kiran Gill, Shirley St Yeung
article en

Abstract

IntroductionNivolumab has demonstrated promising survival outcomes in melanoma. Original dosing was 3 mg/kg (maximum 240 mg) intravenously (IV) every two weeks (Q2 W). Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies demonstrating similar efficacy, 6 mg/kg (maximum 480 mg) IV every four weeks (Q4 W) dosing was introduced. However, real-world effectiveness data remains limited. This study analyzed real-world effectiveness between Q2 W versus Q4 W nivolumab dosing intervals in adjuvant and metastatic melanoma patients.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted to compare overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), prescribing trends, and reasons for switching intervals between Q2 W versus Q4 W nivolumab dosing in advanced and adjuvant melanoma patients. Patients started nivolumab between January 1st, 2019, to December 31st, 2020, and were followed up until July 31st, 2024. Patients were stratified based on the treatment intent.ResultsSeventy patients (advanced n = 27, adjuvant n = 43) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the dosing groups for each treatment intent. In the advanced group, the median time of PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI 0.0 to 48.9 months) for Q2 W group versus 11.7 months (95% CI 0.0 to 33.7 months) for the Q4 W group. The median time of OS was 32.0 months (95% CI 0.0 to 107.2 months) for the Q2 W group compared to 25.2 months (95% CI 0 to 66.7 months) for the Q4 W group. Meanwhile, in the adjuvant group, OS and PFS outcomes were not reached at follow-up: 14/20 (70.0%) and 13/23 (56.5%) patients have not progressed in the Q2 W and Q4 W groups respectively. There were 16/20 (80.0%) and 17/23 (73.9%) who were still alive at the end of follow up in the Q2 W and Q4 W groups, respectively.ConclusionsIn advanced melanoma patients, Q4 W dosing showed comparable effectiveness with Q2 W dosing. Based on these results and previous real-world evidence demonstrating similar safety profiles, Q4 W dosing provides an alternative dosing interval that may lead to decreased healthcare utilization and exposure, while supporting environmental initiatives.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
BC Cancer Agency (CA), Provincial Health Services Authority (CA), Fraser Health (CA), Surrey Memorial Hospital (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.