To Compare and Evaluate the Antibacterial Efficacy of Murraya koenigii (Curry Leaves), Camellia sinensis (Green Tea), and 2% Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis

C. sinensis, and 2% chlorhexidine against E. faecalis.The objective was to identify natural plant-based extracts that could provide comparable efficacy to chemical disinfectants and serve as potential adjuncts in root canal therapy (Fig. 1). 7,8 IntroductIonEnterococcus faecalis is a gram-positive bacterium known for its role in persistent root canal infections, urinary tract infections, and endocarditis.Its inherent resistance to various antimicrobial agents makes it a challenging pathogen to eradicate. 1 In recent years, the search for safe and effective naturally obtained alternatives to synthetic or artificial antimicrobial agents has intensified.Herbal extracts are gaining importance due to their wide spectrum of biological activities, low toxicity, and reduced potential for resistance.Among these, Murraya koenigii (curry leaves) and Camellia sinensis (green tea) have drawn attention for their rich phytochemical composition and proven antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. 2,3 Chlorhexidine remains a commonly used antiseptic in dental practice, effective against a variety of microorganisms. 4However, its adverse effects, such as cytotoxicity, tooth staining, and risk of bacterial resistance, have led researchers to explore herbal alternatives. 5,6 This research was conducted with an objective of analyzing and contrasting the in vitro antibacterial activity of M.