Development of the antimicrobial resistance burden score through a modified eDelphi
Current antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance relies on fragmented indicators that fail to capture institutional AMR burden complexity. To develop the AMR Burden Score, a three-round modified eDelphi study engaged interdisciplinary experts (Round 1: n = 17, Rounds 2 and 3: n = 7), including clinicians, microbiologists, pharmacists, health economists, and public health specialists. The AMR Burden Score comprises six weighted domains: Resistance (25%), Effectiveness (30%), Monitoring (30%), Adoption (5%), Processes (5%), and Systems (5%). Strong consensus emerged for core indicators, including incidence of resistant infections (unanimous Round 3 agreement, median 8.0), pathogen-specific resistance rates (median 7.0), and staff training programmes (median 8.0). The AMR Burden Score provides a structured framework for institutional AMR assessment, though implementation requires context-specific adaptation and further validation.
Authors
- Bryony Dean Franklin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-1245)
- William J. Waldock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-4096)
- F. L. Davies
- César de la Fuente
- Hutan Ashrafian
- Ara Darzi
- Mark Gilchrist
Institutions
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- Translational Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- The London College (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
- Published
- 2026-03-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-026-00184-w
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care