Opportunities and Challenges of Visual Large Language Models in Imaging Diagnostics: Lessons from Brain Metastasis Detection in Clinical MRI

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two visual large language models (vLLMs), GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 3.5 (Anthropic), for detecting brain metastases in routine MRI using combined imaging and textual input. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 31 patients with and 46 without brain metastases with underlying melanoma (<i>n</i> = 24), lung cancer (<i>n</i> = 23), breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 17), or renal cell carcinoma (<i>n</i> = 13). In total, 100 MRI examinations (50 with, 50 without metastases) were provided to both vLLMs using a single representative slice per sequence, together with clinical history and the referring question. The generated free-text reports were evaluated for detection accuracy, overdiagnosis, correct sequence recognition, anatomical localization, lesion laterality, and lesion size estimation. <b>Results</b>: Both vLLMs showed perfect sensitivity (100% for both) but very low specificity (GPT-4o: 8%, Sonnet 3.5: 4%; <i>p</i> = 0.625), resulting in low diagnostic accuracy (GPT-4o: 54%, Sonnet 3.5: 52%; <i>p</i> = 0.625). Sequence identification was highly accurate in both models, with GPT-4o performing significantly better (100% vs. 93%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Identification of the anatomical brain region (70% vs. 72%; <i>p</i> = 1.00) and lesion laterality (62% vs. 76%; <i>p</i> = 0.189) was comparable. Both models hallucinated additional lesions in 12% of cases. Lesion size measurements showed no significant differences between the models or in comparison with the radiologist. <b>Conclusions</b>: GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 can generate radiological reports and detect brain metastases with excellent sensitivity, but their very low specificity, frequent hallucinations, and limited spatial reliability currently preclude clinical application. Future work should address how the balance between visual and textual input influences diagnostic behavior in vLLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050749
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and Challenges of Visual Large Language Models in Imaging Diagnostics: Lessons from Brain Metastasis Detection in Clinical MRI

Andra-Iza Iuga, Christian Nelles, Robert Terzis, Simon Lennartz et al.
Diagnostics
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Opportunities and Challenges of Visual Large Language Models in Imaging Diagnostics: Lessons from Brain Metastasis Detection in Clinical MRI

Andra-Iza Iuga, Christian Nelles, Robert Terzis, Simon Lennartz, L Görtz, Marvin A Spurek, David Maintz, Jonathan Kottlors, Nour Abou Zeid
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two visual large language models (vLLMs), GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 3.5 (Anthropic), for detecting brain metastases in routine MRI using combined imaging and textual input. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 31 patients with and 46 without brain metastases with underlying melanoma (<i>n</i> = 24), lung cancer (<i>n</i> = 23), breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 17), or renal cell carcinoma (<i>n</i> = 13). In total, 100 MRI examinations (50 with, 50 without metastases) were provided to both vLLMs using a single representative slice per sequence, together with clinical history and the referring question. The generated free-text reports were evaluated for detection accuracy, overdiagnosis, correct sequence recognition, anatomical localization, lesion laterality, and lesion size estimation. <b>Results</b>: Both vLLMs showed perfect sensitivity (100% for both) but very low specificity (GPT-4o: 8%, Sonnet 3.5: 4%; <i>p</i> = 0.625), resulting in low diagnostic accuracy (GPT-4o: 54%, Sonnet 3.5: 52%; <i>p</i> = 0.625). Sequence identification was highly accurate in both models, with GPT-4o performing significantly better (100% vs. 93%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Identification of the anatomical brain region (70% vs. 72%; <i>p</i> = 1.00) and lesion laterality (62% vs. 76%; <i>p</i> = 0.189) was comparable. Both models hallucinated additional lesions in 12% of cases. Lesion size measurements showed no significant differences between the models or in comparison with the radiologist. <b>Conclusions</b>: GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 can generate radiological reports and detect brain metastases with excellent sensitivity, but their very low specificity, frequent hallucinations, and limited spatial reliability currently preclude clinical application. Future work should address how the balance between visual and textual input influences diagnostic behavior in vLLMs.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(5)
University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.