Support Vector Machine and k-Means Clustering for Advanced Wheel Flat Identification: A Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Methods

Artificial-intelligence-driven wayside monitoring has become a promising solution for early identification of railway wheel flats, enabling safer operations and more efficient maintenance planning. This study introduces a comparative investigation of supervised and unsupervised machine learning strategies for wheel flat identification, with particular emphasis on real-time applicability and sensor cost reduction. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and k-means clustering are evaluated as representative supervised and unsupervised approaches using vibration data obtained from numerically simulated train–track interactions under realistic operating conditions, including train speeds of 120 km/h and 200 km/h and multiple wheel flat severities. A key contribution of this work is the proposal of a simplified supervised classification framework that directly exploits Auto-Regressive features extracted from rail-mounted accelerometers, eliminating the need for feature normalization and multi-sensor data fusion. This simplification significantly reduces computational effort, making the approach suitable for real-time deployment in operational railway environments. In parallel, a systematic sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the influence of sensor placement and to identify the minimum sensor configuration required to achieve reliable damage classification. The outputs from the current study show that an SVM emerges with more accurate defect classification than the k-means clustering, allowing a wayside system with fewer sensors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14030286
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support Vector Machine and k-Means Clustering for Advanced Wheel Flat Identification: A Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Methods

Andreia Meixedo, Abdollah Malekjafarian, Araliya Mosleh, Cecília Vale et al.
Machines
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

Support Vector Machine and k-Means Clustering for Advanced Wheel Flat Identification: A Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Methods

Andreia Meixedo, Abdollah Malekjafarian, Araliya Mosleh, Cecília Vale, A. Catarina Guedes, Ramin Ghiasi, Alireza Chegini, Mohammadreza Mohammadi, Ruben Silva
article en

Abstract

Artificial-intelligence-driven wayside monitoring has become a promising solution for early identification of railway wheel flats, enabling safer operations and more efficient maintenance planning. This study introduces a comparative investigation of supervised and unsupervised machine learning strategies for wheel flat identification, with particular emphasis on real-time applicability and sensor cost reduction. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and k-means clustering are evaluated as representative supervised and unsupervised approaches using vibration data obtained from numerically simulated train–track interactions under realistic operating conditions, including train speeds of 120 km/h and 200 km/h and multiple wheel flat severities. A key contribution of this work is the proposal of a simplified supervised classification framework that directly exploits Auto-Regressive features extracted from rail-mounted accelerometers, eliminating the need for feature normalization and multi-sensor data fusion. This simplification significantly reduces computational effort, making the approach suitable for real-time deployment in operational railway environments. In parallel, a systematic sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the influence of sensor placement and to identify the minimum sensor configuration required to achieve reliable damage classification. The outputs from the current study show that an SVM emerges with more accurate defect classification than the k-means clustering, allowing a wayside system with fewer sensors.

MachinesVol. 14(3)
University College Dublin (IE), Universidade do Porto (PT), Qazvin Islamic Azad University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.