Complete set of positivity constraints on the HEFT at NLO

We present the complete set of positivity bounds on the Higgs effective field theory (HEFT) at next-to-leading order (NLO). We identify the 15 operators that can be constrained by positivity, as they contribute to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>s</a:mi> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msup> </a:math> -growth in the amplitude for longitudinal gauge-Higgs scattering, that is to all possible 2-to-2 scattering processes involving longitudinal gauge bosons, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msub> <c:mi>V</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:msubsup> <c:mi>W</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mo>±</c:mo> </c:msubsup> <c:mo>,</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>Z</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:math> , and the Higgs boson, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>h</e:mi> </e:math> . We find two sets of constraints: (i) specific linear combinations of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>C</g:mi> <g:mi>P</g:mi> </g:math> -even Wilson coefficients (WCs) must be positive, and (ii) the magnitudes of some WCs—including all <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>C</i:mi> <i:mi>P</i:mi> </i:math> -odd ones—must be smaller than products of other <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>C</k:mi> <k:mi>P</k:mi> </k:math> -even WCs. We present our final constraints on the 15 dimensional HEFT space and show how known positivity bounds on the 3 dimensional space of dimension 8 SMEFT can be recovered from them. We find that only about 5% of the parameter space for WCs of HEFT operators at NLO complies with these positivity constraints. Additionally, we obtain double-sided bounds on these WCs by fully exploiting the implications of unitarity and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:math> -crossing symmetry. For WCs contributing to the vector boson scattering process our final constraints are in most cases significantly stronger than the experimental ones. For the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>V</o:mi> <o:mi>L</o:mi> </o:msub> <o:msub> <o:mi>V</o:mi> <o:mi>L</o:mi> </o:msub> <o:mo>,</o:mo> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mo stretchy="false">→</o:mo> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mi>h</o:mi> </o:math> and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:mo>,</r:mo> <r:mi>h</r:mi> <r:mi>h</r:mi> <r:mo stretchy="false">→</r:mo> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:mi>h</r:mi> </r:math> process, there are no reported experimental limits and our theoretical constraints provide the first bounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/7qgz-9ykc
Primary Topic
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complete set of positivity constraints on the HEFT at NLO

Anonymous
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
article

Complete set of positivity constraints on the HEFT at NLO

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

We present the complete set of positivity bounds on the Higgs effective field theory (HEFT) at next-to-leading order (NLO). We identify the 15 operators that can be constrained by positivity, as they contribute to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>s</a:mi> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msup> </a:math> -growth in the amplitude for longitudinal gauge-Higgs scattering, that is to all possible 2-to-2 scattering processes involving longitudinal gauge bosons, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msub> <c:mi>V</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:msubsup> <c:mi>W</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mo>±</c:mo> </c:msubsup> <c:mo>,</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>Z</c:mi> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:math> , and the Higgs boson, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>h</e:mi> </e:math> . We find two sets of constraints: (i) specific linear combinations of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>C</g:mi> <g:mi>P</g:mi> </g:math> -even Wilson coefficients (WCs) must be positive, and (ii) the magnitudes of some WCs—including all <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>C</i:mi> <i:mi>P</i:mi> </i:math> -odd ones—must be smaller than products of other <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>C</k:mi> <k:mi>P</k:mi> </k:math> -even WCs. We present our final constraints on the 15 dimensional HEFT space and show how known positivity bounds on the 3 dimensional space of dimension 8 SMEFT can be recovered from them. We find that only about 5% of the parameter space for WCs of HEFT operators at NLO complies with these positivity constraints. Additionally, we obtain double-sided bounds on these WCs by fully exploiting the implications of unitarity and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:math> -crossing symmetry. For WCs contributing to the vector boson scattering process our final constraints are in most cases significantly stronger than the experimental ones. For the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>V</o:mi> <o:mi>L</o:mi> </o:msub> <o:msub> <o:mi>V</o:mi> <o:mi>L</o:mi> </o:msub> <o:mo>,</o:mo> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mo stretchy="false">→</o:mo> <o:mi>h</o:mi> <o:mi>h</o:mi> </o:math> and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:mo>,</r:mo> <r:mi>h</r:mi> <r:mi>h</r:mi> <r:mo stretchy="false">→</r:mo> <r:msub> <r:mi>V</r:mi> <r:mi>L</r:mi> </r:msub> <r:mi>h</r:mi> </r:math> process, there are no reported experimental limits and our theoretical constraints provide the first bounds.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(5)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.