Artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems in Brazil: technical feasibility and incubation performance

Family poultry farming plays an important role in food security and income generation in rural Brazil; however, chick production in these systems still relies predominantly on natural incubation, which limits productivity and flock renewal. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems by characterizing the socioeconomic profile and knowledge of rural producers regarding artificial incubation, implementing training and incubator distribution, and comparing incubation performance between rural farm and laboratory environments. The research was conducted in four regions of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and involved 87 family poultry farmers operating free-range production systems. Structured questionnaires were applied to characterize producers' socioeconomic profiles, management practices, and knowledge regarding artificial incubation. From this group, 45 producers received theoretical and practical training (20 h) and were equipped with single-stage incubators with a capacity of 100 eggs. A total of 87 incubation trials were performed, including 45 trials on rural farms and 42 trials in laboratory environments. Producers were predominantly aged 50 years or older, had low formal education, and reported poultry farming as their main animal production activity. Although 74.7% were familiar with artificial incubation and recognized its advantages, reliance on broody hens (49.4%) and lack of egg sanitization (60.9%) were still common. There were no differences between farm and laboratory settings regarding hatchability (62.40 ± 2.19% vs. 62.87 ± 2.45%), hatchability of fertile eggs (80.09 ± 1.90% vs. 78.36 ± 2.38%), fertility (77.79 ± 1.81% vs. 80.42 ± 1.99%), stage-specific embryonic mortality, or overall incubation losses. These results demonstrate that family poultry farmers, when provided with appropriate training and technical support, are capable of achieving incubation outcomes equivalent to those obtained under controlled laboratory conditions. Artificial incubation is therefore a technically viable and scalable technology to improve chick availability, support flock renewal, and strengthen family poultry farming systems in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2026.106732
Primary Topic
Livestock and Poultry Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems in Brazil: technical feasibility and incubation performance

Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo, L.J.C. Lara, Adriana Gonçalves Silva, J.M.S. Martins et al.
Poultry Science
Livestock and Poultry Management
article

Artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems in Brazil: technical feasibility and incubation performance

Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo, L.J.C. Lara, Adriana Gonçalves Silva, J.M.S. Martins, Henrique Carneiro Lobato, Júlia Macedo Fernandes Oliveira, Itallo Conrado Sousa Araujo, Otoniel Félix Souza, Kimberly Cristina Abreu Alves, Kalu Chaves de Paula, Renata Ribeiro Alvarenga, Adriano Geraldo
article en

Abstract

Family poultry farming plays an important role in food security and income generation in rural Brazil; however, chick production in these systems still relies predominantly on natural incubation, which limits productivity and flock renewal. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of artificial incubation in family poultry farming systems by characterizing the socioeconomic profile and knowledge of rural producers regarding artificial incubation, implementing training and incubator distribution, and comparing incubation performance between rural farm and laboratory environments. The research was conducted in four regions of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and involved 87 family poultry farmers operating free-range production systems. Structured questionnaires were applied to characterize producers' socioeconomic profiles, management practices, and knowledge regarding artificial incubation. From this group, 45 producers received theoretical and practical training (20 h) and were equipped with single-stage incubators with a capacity of 100 eggs. A total of 87 incubation trials were performed, including 45 trials on rural farms and 42 trials in laboratory environments. Producers were predominantly aged 50 years or older, had low formal education, and reported poultry farming as their main animal production activity. Although 74.7% were familiar with artificial incubation and recognized its advantages, reliance on broody hens (49.4%) and lack of egg sanitization (60.9%) were still common. There were no differences between farm and laboratory settings regarding hatchability (62.40 ± 2.19% vs. 62.87 ± 2.45%), hatchability of fertile eggs (80.09 ± 1.90% vs. 78.36 ± 2.38%), fertility (77.79 ± 1.81% vs. 80.42 ± 1.99%), stage-specific embryonic mortality, or overall incubation losses. These results demonstrate that family poultry farmers, when provided with appropriate training and technical support, are capable of achieving incubation outcomes equivalent to those obtained under controlled laboratory conditions. Artificial incubation is therefore a technically viable and scalable technology to improve chick availability, support flock renewal, and strengthen family poultry farming systems in Brazil.

Poultry ScienceVol. 105(6)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Livestock and Poultry Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.