Impossibility of depth reduction in explainable clustering

Over the last few years Explainable Clustering has gathered a lot of attention. Dasgupta et al. [ICML’20] initiated the study of explainable k -means and k -median clustering problems where the explanation is captured by a threshold decision tree which partitions the space at each node using axis parallel hyperplanes. Recently, Laber et al. [Pattern Recognition’23] made a case to consider the depth of the decision tree as an additional complexity measure of interest. In this work, we prove that even when the input points are in the Euclidean plane, then any depth reduction in the explanation incurs unbounded loss in the k -means and k -median cost. Formally, we show that there exists a data set X ⊆ R 2 , for which there is a decision tree of depth k − 1 whose k -means/ k -median cost matches the optimal clustering cost of X , but every decision tree of depth less than k − 1 has unbounded cost w.r.t. the optimal cost of clustering. We extend our results to the k -center objective as well, albeit with weaker guarantees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Computation
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105430
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impossibility of depth reduction in explainable clustering

Chengyuan Deng, Adarsh Srinivasan, Parth Patel, Surya Teja Gavva
Information and Computation
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

Impossibility of depth reduction in explainable clustering

Chengyuan Deng, Adarsh Srinivasan, Parth Patel, Surya Teja Gavva
article en

Abstract

Over the last few years Explainable Clustering has gathered a lot of attention. Dasgupta et al. [ICML’20] initiated the study of explainable k -means and k -median clustering problems where the explanation is captured by a threshold decision tree which partitions the space at each node using axis parallel hyperplanes. Recently, Laber et al. [Pattern Recognition’23] made a case to consider the depth of the decision tree as an additional complexity measure of interest. In this work, we prove that even when the input points are in the Euclidean plane, then any depth reduction in the explanation incurs unbounded loss in the k -means and k -median cost. Formally, we show that there exists a data set X ⊆ R 2 , for which there is a decision tree of depth k − 1 whose k -means/ k -median cost matches the optimal clustering cost of X , but every decision tree of depth less than k − 1 has unbounded cost w.r.t. the optimal cost of clustering. We extend our results to the k -center objective as well, albeit with weaker guarantees.

Information and ComputationVol. 310
Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.